Wednesday, April 25, 2007

CA AB 1634 Moves Out of Committee

As you may have heard the bad news - the Bill "passed" the Business & Professional Committee and is now progressed for vote by the Appropriations Committeee. This was on Tuesday April 24. The USA is reviewing its strategy and how it should guide the membership on the next steps. The Appropriations Committeee deals with dollars and cents and we should identify how this will hurt the economy of the State if it passes.

More to follow. Our lead on this is Cathy Cross of the GEC.

For more information please check out the AKC site which provides more information -

Quote

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Today, the California Assembly Business and Professions Committee voted in favor of Assembly Bill 1634. The bill will now be considered by the Assembly Appropriations Committee. After today's committee hearing, several hundred fanciers who had attended distributed educational materials provided by AKC staff to their assemblymember and expressed their opposition to AB 1634.

For more details click here

Read More...

Friday, April 20, 2007

AB 1634 - California Healthy Pets Act

Update as of April 20, 2007

The AKC has some recent updates and we encourage you to visit these -

1. this discusses how some of the local governments are proposing to adopt the provisions of AB 1634 locally even if it does not pass at a State level. Please click here.

2. the amendments to AB1634 and action recommended are given here.

We continue to urge our members to visit this site where we will provide guidance as available to help you fight the Bill and its residual action at a local level.

Read More...

Friday, April 13, 2007

AB 1634 - California Healthy Pets Act

AB 1634 - California Healthy Pets Act

Update - April 13, 2007

Status

Based on information available to us, the California Assembly Business and Professions Committee (BNP) discussed Assembly Bill 1634 (Bill) on April 10. Those present were provided circa 6 minutes to state their name/address, organization (if any) and voice their approval or dissent with the Bill. No presentations per se were made.

Based such voting and also counting the letters received by the previous cut off date of March 31, 2007, there were 1318 (1100 Individuals and 218 Organizations) supporting and 1209 (1000 Individuals and 209 Organizations) dissenting. The USA is listed as one of the latter.

Assemblyman Lloyd Levine is also making another revision to Bill which he is required to produce to the BNP by April 16. It is expected to be made public by April 17 (also the tax deadline). The BNP will meet again in a week, on April 24,to make a final determination on the Bill. No presentations are anticipated to be possible on this date.


Progression

If the Bill passes the BNP this is the expected progression -

- Appropriations Committee (who will examine the Dollars and Cents)
- Assembly Floor for a vote
- Senate Floor for a vote
- Governor for signature.

There will be opportunities at each of these stages to voice our dissent but ideally we should like to see it killed at the BNP level. We, however, need plan for any eventuality.

What should we do now?

1. If you have sent a letter before -

USA Clubs who have written to the BNP are encouraged to re-submit their letters by fax to reach the BNP before April 17 (although Tracy Rhine, the BNP Secretary has apparently advised that this is not necessary - it may still be useful in case the first letter has gone astray).

2. If you have not sent any letters as yet -

Clubs and individuals who have not written so far MUST submit their opposition to the Bill and a simple letter format is given below. Our take on this is that the contents of the communication are not being considered. It is merely going into two piles - one for and one against. Also given below are Committtee names and fax numbers.

PLEASE send the fax as soon as possible but no later than Tuesday, April 17. To preclude a pile up or a "fax Jam" - you should send it by Monday the latest.Please cut and paste the letter as appropriate.

As of date there are no further updates on this in the AKC or SOD sites but you are encouraged to visit them. The USA’s role is to provide some guidance to the membership but we are cognizant that given our size and representation; we need be followers and not necessarily take any lead on this. We will leave that role to the AKC, SOD etc and will work in coordination with them to the same end.
..............................

Format of Club Letter


(Club Name)
(Street Address)
(City/State/Zip Code)

April 13, 2007

The Honorable Mike Eng, Chair
Assembly Business and Professions Committee
State Capitol
P.O. Box 942849
Sacramento, CA 94249-0049

Subject: AB 1634 (Levine/Amended) California Healthy Pets Act – OPPOSE

Dear Assemblyman Eng:

As a member of the United Schutzhund Clubs of America (USA), our club opposes AB 1634 for the reasons stated by our President in his letter sent to the Business and Professions Committee on March 30, 2007. Our club requests inclusion in the listed opposition to the bill.

Very truly yours,


(Your name)
(Your office title)

cc: Assembly Business and Professions Committee Members





Format of Member (Individual) Letter




April 13, 2007

The Honorable Mike Eng, Chair
Assembly Business and Professions Committee
State Capitol
P.O. Box 942849
Sacramento, CA 94249-0049

Subject: AB 1634 (Levine/Amended) California Healthy Pets Act – OPPOSE

Dear Assemblyman Eng:

As a member of the United Schutzhund Clubs of America (USA), I oppose AB 1634 for the reasons stated by our President in his letter sent to the Business and Professions Committee on March 30, 2007. I request inclusion in the listed opposition to the bill.

Very truly yours,


(Your name)
(Your street address)
(Your city/state/zip code)

cc: Assembly Business and Professions Committee Members


......................................

ASSEMBLY BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS COMMITTEE

Name and Fax Numbers

Ms. Tracy Rhine, Committee Consultant – 916-319-3306
Mr. Ted Blanchard, Assembly Republication Policy Consultant – 916-319-3902
Assemblyman Mike Eng, Chair – 916-319-2149
Assemblyman Bill Emmerson, Vice Chair –916-319-2163
Assemblywoman Karen Bass –916-319-2147
Assemblywoman Wilmer Amina Carter –916-319-2162
Assemblywoman Mary Hayashi –916-319-2118
Assemblyman Edward Hernandez –916-319-2157
Assemblywoman Shirley Horton –916-319-2178
Assemblyman Bill Maze –916-319-2134 - Note Below
Assemblyman Curren Price –916-319-2151
Assemblyman Alberto Torrico –916-319-2120

Note

We understand that Bill Maze is opposing the Bill and has apparently requested that he not be sent any faxes.





Read More...

Monday, April 2, 2007

Update - California Healthy Pets Act

What we have done so far ( position April 6, 2007)

1. advised the USA membership through the Regional Directors to voice their protests by writing/calling/faxing their Elected representative(s). Letter formats have been provided ( see letter below and also visit the Post below for more details). Obviously the membership has rallied to the cause as we have had over 600 hits since sending details to the 50 or so USA clubs in California. Our Regional Directors are to be thanked for taking this task on. Unless there is Constituent protest; this Bill may pass in some form....and guess what..the Bill has been amended again. For the new version please click here. (to return to the Blog; please use your browsers back arrow key).

For more details of these changes please visit the AKC site or the Save Our Dogs site.

2.considering sending a senior member of the USA's Executive Board to make a presentation to the Committee provided we are given enough floor time.

3. submitted a strong letter of protest signed by the USA President to the Committee considering the Bill. For full text of the letter please click here.(to return to the Blog; please use your browsers back arrow key). The AKC has also sent a protest and the letter from their President & CEO is here and the very compelling one from their Chairman to Governor Schwarzenegger is here. The latter discusses what is of paramount importance to the State - loss of revenues.

We urge all to visit the AKC and Save Our Dogs sites. Both of them are taking concerted action to defeat the bill and may have more up to date information available. The USA's role is to provide its members with all and any assistance they may need to achieve this end as well. We will work with all organisations having the same goals.


For Suggested USA Letter - please click on Read More

Date

# Any Street
Any City, CA Zip Code


The Honorable full name
State Capitol
Room number
Sacramento, CA Zip Code

Dear Assembly Member or Senator (use last name)

AB 1634 - California Healthy Pets Act

(Suggested Opening Paragraph – modify as appropriate)

I am a Constituent and a responsible dog owner (add breeder, trainer etc as appropriate) belonging to The United Schutzhund Clubs of America ("USA") and am writing to express my opposition to California Assembly Bill AB 1634 (“Bill”). Whilst the intent of the Bill “to reduce the number of cats and dogs in shelters” is indeed laudable; it will nonetheless be ineffective. It will only serve to penalize responsible dog owners and breeders. Furthermore, it will encourage puppy buyers to import from out of state or even from overseas from "puppy factories" and other commercial breeders. Also, it will encourage those who are irresponsible to not license their pets and remain "under the radar" so to speak. If enacted this Bill would impose undue financial hardships to “in state” German Shepherd Dog (and other Breed) owners, breeders and trainers.

(Suggested Paragraphs – choose/modify as appropriate)

As you are aware, German Shepherd Dogs have a time-honored tradition of protecting the innocent and vulnerable members of society. They protect and assist police officers and military personnel in fighting crime and terrorism. They serve worldwide as police dogs, military dogs, search-and-rescue dogs, guide dogs for the blind, therapy dogs, and assistance dogs. They also serve as loyal and faithful family pets.

Mandatory spay and neuter provisions, as envisaged by the Bill, would prevent the selection of breeding-quality working German Shepherds, and could effectively wipe out in one generation, what breeders have strived to safeguard and develop for a century. It is simply not practical for any breeder to identify dogs which have the inherent breeding potential at a young age as four months resulting in them being required to pay intact permit fees. The choice of spaying or neutering should be left to the dog owners as it otherwise infringes on their civil liberties as Citizens of a Free Country.

Although the Bill “exempts” certain dogs if they are registered with certain “approved” Registries and/or serve law enforcement or other such agencies; it still does not exempt these dogs from payment of “intact permit fees” on which there is no "cap" or "limit" in the amounts which can be levied by the local jurisdictions at will and without any justification. Dog owners will be required to subsidize any inefficiency in local animal control and management which will be continually passed across to them in the form of such fees.

This Bill also does not recognize that certain “Registries” such as the USA have strict controls and regulations in place to preclude indiscriminate and improper breeding. Dogs registered with the USA are bred under strict guidelines requiring a variety of certifications as to temperament, obedience, and other canine aspects of good behavior. There is also control imposed on line and in breeding. It is also a pre-requisite for all breeding females and stud dogs to have good health certifications in respect of Hip Dysplasia etc. There are also limits placed on the number of litters that can be registered by the Breeder and the litter (puppies) and the Dam are visited by a Regional Breed Warden to ensure that they are sound, in good health and their environment conforms to USA standards. In addition the puppies are all tattooed to provide effective identification.

The Bill if passed in any form will also impact the livelihood of a number of people in the California who manage either full time or part time to make ends meet by operating small and home based businesses dealing with training, breeding and production of canine related items for sale. In addition, the reduction of purebred dogs in the State will reduce the number of dog shows which are held annually. This and the reduction in sales of dog and cat related food and other items will cause an equivalent reduction in the amount of sales tax collected and also result in some level of unemployment or underemployment. As such, the Bill will cause a tremendous negative impact to the economy of the State.

(Suggested ending Paragraph – modify as appropriate)

The provisions of the Bill are clearly impractical, do not achieve the purpose for it was intended and makes the cure worse than the disease. If the Bill is passed all it will do is to encourage the importation of pups and dogs from out of state/overseas. This does not necessarily mean that these “imported” dogs will not end up in shelters. We strongly oppose this transgression of our rights as law abiding citizens of the State of California and urge you to take all steps as necessary to have the Bill withdrawn.

Yours Sincerely

Read More...

Thursday, March 22, 2007

AB 1634 - California Healthy Pets Act

The Issue

The California Assembly Bill AB 1634 (“Bill”) is sponsored by Assemblyman Lloyd Levine and is being marketed as a means to reduce the numbers of dogs and cats in California shelters.

In essence the Bill will prohibit any person in California from owning or possessing any unaltered cat or dog over the age of four months, unless that person possesses an intact permit, with unspecified "intact permit fees," and impose severe financial (and possibly criminal) penalties for noncompliance.

Note - Passing of this Bill in any form will entice other States and Jurisdictions to follow suit.

Accordingly to information available, this Bill may go to Committee on April 17 and the USA is taking proactive steps to engage it with a view to either "kill it" or have it suitably modified.

To read the original Bill, please click here.(Please use the back arrow key of your browser to return to the Blog)



Proposed Action

1. Provided it does go to Committee and we are given adequate floor time, a senior Member of the Executive Committee will be making a presentation on the USA’s position on the Bill. It is also likely that the AKC will be taking a very determined stand against the Bill as although AKC (and certain other Breed Registries) registered dogs are "exempt" from the provisions they are not "exempt" from paying the intact permit fees. The USA is also supportive of the actions taken by some of its members in fighting the Bill from other fronts and will encourage you to visit the Save Our Dogs website ( see Useful Links on right).

2. All of this notwithstanding, our collective objections will be heard more clearly if the USA membership rallies and voices their views by writing/faxing/calling their Elected Representative(s).

Letter Format

Such that you may have some guidance on what you can include in your letter, we give below a format of a USA suggested letter as well as the letter contained in Save Our Dogs site.We recommend that you choose paragraphs as appropriate from any of the letters as the intent is to defeat the Bill and choosing a variety of content will preclude your letter being considered a canned presentation. We, however, urge that you use some language in your letter which will identify you as an USA member.

How to find your Elected Representative(s).

Please click here to find out who represents you in the California State Legislature.(Please use the back arrow key of your browser to return to the Blog.)

Suggested USA Letter

Date

# Any Street
Any City, CA Zip Code


The Honorable full name
State Capitol
Room number
Sacramento, CA Zip Code

Dear Assembly Member or Senator (use last name)

AB 1634 - California Healthy Pets Act

(Suggested Opening Paragraph – modify as appropriate)

I am a Constituent and a responsible dog owner (add breeder, trainer etc as appropriate) belonging to The United Schutzhund Clubs of America ("USA") and am writing to express my opposition to California Assembly Bill AB 1634 (“Bill”). Whilst the intent of the Bill “to reduce the number of cats and dogs in shelters” is indeed laudable; it will nonetheless be ineffective. It will only serve to penalize responsible dog owners and breeders. Furthermore, it will encourage puppy buyers to import from out of state or even from overseas from "puppy factories" and other commercial breeders. Also, it will encourage those who are irresponsible to not license their pets and remain "under the radar" so to speak. If enacted this Bill would impose undue financial hardships to “in state” German Shepherd Dog (and other Breed) owners, breeders and trainers.

(Suggested Paragraphs – choose/modify as appropriate)

As you are aware, German Shepherd Dogs have a time-honored tradition of protecting the innocent and vulnerable members of society. They protect and assist police officers and military personnel in fighting crime and terrorism. They serve worldwide as police dogs, military dogs, search-and-rescue dogs, guide dogs for the blind, therapy dogs, and assistance dogs. They also serve as loyal and faithful family pets.

Mandatory spay and neuter provisions, as envisaged by the Bill, would prevent the selection of breeding-quality working German Shepherds, and could effectively wipe out in one generation, what breeders have strived to safeguard and develop for a century. It is simply not practical for any breeder to identify dogs which have the inherent breeding potential at a young age as four months resulting in them being required to pay intact permit fees. The choice of spaying or neutering should be left to the dog owners as it otherwise infringes on their civil liberties as Citizens of a Free Country.

Although the Bill “exempts” certain dogs if they are registered with certain “approved” Registries and/or serve law enforcement or other such agencies; it still does not exempt these dogs from payment of “intact permit fees” on which there is no "cap" or "limit" in the amounts which can be levied by the local jurisdictions at will and without any justification. Dog owners will be required to subsidize any inefficiency in local animal control and management which will be continually passed across to them in the form of such fees.

This Bill also does not recognize that certain “Registries” such as the USA have strict controls and regulations in place to preclude indiscriminate and improper breeding. Dogs registered with the USA are bred under strict guidelines requiring a variety of certifications as to temperament, obedience, and other canine aspects of good behavior. There is also control imposed on line and in breeding. It is also a pre-requisite for all breeding females and stud dogs to have good health certifications in respect of Hip Dysplasia etc. There are also limits placed on the number of litters that can be registered by the Breeder and the litter (puppies) and the Dam are visited by a Regional Breed Warden to ensure that they are sound, in good health and their environment conforms to USA standards. In addition the puppies are all tattooed to provide effective identification.

The Bill if passed in any form will also impact the livelihood of a number of people in the California who manage either full time or part time to make ends meet by operating small and home based businesses dealing with training, breeding and production of canine related items for sale. In addition, the reduction of purebred dogs in the State will reduce the number of dog shows which are held annually. This and the reduction in sales of dog and cat related food and other items will cause an equivalent reduction in the amount of sales tax collected and also result in some level of unemployment or underemployment. As such, the Bill will cause a tremendous negative impact to the economy of the State.

(Suggested ending Paragraph – modify as appropriate)

The provisions of the Bill are clearly impractical, do not achieve the purpose for it was intended and makes the cure worse than the disease. If the Bill is passed all it will do is to encourage the importation of pups and dogs from out of state/overseas. This does not necessarily mean that these “imported” dogs will not end up in shelters. We strongly oppose this transgression of our rights as law abiding citizens of the State of California and urge you to take all steps as necessary to have the Bill withdrawn.

Yours Sincerely



................

Save Your Dogs Letter

As your constituent and a dog owner, I respectfully ask you to oppose Assembly Bill 1634, the California Healthy Pets Act. This bill is intended to reduce the number of cats and dogs in shelters in California. It will not. It will strip law abiding and ethical dog owners of their rights to their property, increase the number of puppy-mill puppies imported from out of state, and destroy the working dogs of California. It is bad law supporting the radical animal rights agenda of eliminating all domestic animals.

AB 1634 tries to reduce shelter populations by reducing the number of unwanted litters. That is not the source of the problem. Most puppies from unwanted litters are adopted in just days. A few shelters get more puppies than they need, but the excess are sent to other shelters that can adopt out more puppies than they receive. The problem is unwanted adult dogs. We live in a throw-away society and AB 1634 will have no impact on the number of adults in shelters. Owner education and voluntary spay/neuter outreach have proven effective in reducing shelter populations while protecting the rights of law abiding and ethical owners.
AB 1634 includes exemptions for certain working dogs, but in fact these exemptions are useless. The bill exempts trained and certified Guide Dogs, police dogs and search dogs employed by law enforcement. Other dogs must be altered by four months of age. No dog is a trained and certified Guide Dog, police dog, or search dog at four months of age. Typically these dogs are not certified until closer to two years of age so the exemption for certified dogs beyond the current generation is meaningless.

The bill includes an exemption for dogs registered with the AKC, UKC, and ADBA. Many or even most working dogs in California are not registered with one of these kennel clubs. Some are registered with other registries, but many are not and many are unregisterable. The AKC has said that AKC registration is not a sign of good breeding. Kennel club registration has no relationship to whether a dog is a good dog or not. Working dog breeders select the dogs they want to breed based on performance, not paperwork. AB 1634 substitutes the decisions of a government bureaucrat for the judgment and experience of an expert breeder, destroying all working dog breeds in the state.

Mandatory spay/neuter is a step toward eliminating pets in California. It is not a reasonable policy to address the shelter population. It hurts all ethical owners to the benefit of unethical and out of state breeders. I hope you will oppose this bad bill. I look forward to your reply.

Thank you for your consideration.


Read More...

Saturday, March 10, 2007

Schutzhund and the German Shepherd Dog

The following is the final text for the informational brochure on Schutzhund aimed at an audience who are totally unfamiliar with it. The text will be used for print-at-home brochures made available to the membership and the general public who are the ultimate target audience. Please contact Christine Gajda by email if you need a pdf file for reproduction.


We also intend producing a "glossy" which will contain graphics to enhance the text. This is still work in progress.


Please email comments to Christine Gajda o
r post them as a Comment in the Blog. Although this is being treated as a final version, we will continuously revise the text based on comments emailed to us and/or posted so as to keep this as a live working document.



Schutzhund and the German Shepherd Dog

Schutzhund was developed in Germany in the early 1900s as a breed suitability test for the German Shepherd Dog. It was designed to test the natural instincts of the breed and to weed out the dogs that were either unstable or untrainable. This helped ensure that breeding stock would pass on the most desirable traits to working dogs such as police dogs, military dogs, and search and rescue dogs

Over the past century Schutzhund has remained a breed test but has also evolved into a sport that can be enjoyed by people of all walks of life, from new dog owners to seasoned competitors. In many countries, Schutzhund titles are still considered prerequisites for breeding rights, and in some countries Schutzhund is called "The Versatility Test for Working Dogs." It offers an opportunity for dog owners to compete with each other for recognition of both the handler's ability to train, and the dog's ability to perform as required. Persons of all ages and even those with significant disabilities are able to participate and enjoy the sport. Often it is a family hobby.

Contrary to the popular misconception that Schutzhund is "all about protection," it is actually securely founded on obedience and control of a dog's natural instincts and drives. Schutzhund dogs are safe, stable companions in the home and in public, good with children, under control, and at peace with their surroundings.

A Schutzhund trial begins with a temperament test for all entered dogs, where the handler must walk the dog through a crowd of strangers, and the judge observes the dog's reaction to being approached closely on a loose leash. Dogs that show shyness or aggression are dismissed from the trial. This basic temperament test is repeated and must be passed before each trial. This helps to ensure that the dog is safe with strangers and in a crowded situation.

The three parts of a Schutzhund trial are tracking, obedience and protection, and the dog must receive passing scores in all three phases to be awarded the title at a trial. Dogs that are out of control or show sound sensitivity are dismissed and this is noted in their scorebook. Dogs that show aggression towards other dogs may be dismissed as well.

Tracking in Schutzhund is sometimes referred to as "footstep tracking." The dog is required to keep his nose on the ground the entire track and locate certain articles strategically placed on the track. A Schutzhund 1 track is laid by the handler, approximately 300 paces long, and aged approximately 20 minutes. The most advanced tracking titles are over 1800 paces, aged for 3 hours, and involve complex angles, varying surfaces, and are laid by a stranger. Tracking is a test of the dog's ability to concentrate on a single task for extended periods of time, and independence in solving problems, as the handler must be 33 feet behind the dog. The working out of the track must be methodical and precise.

The obedience phase requires many of the same exercises that are seen in other venues, such as heeling, sits, downs, and retrieves. In a Schutzhund routine, the paired handlers must report with their dogs off leash. One dog performs a long down while the other does the routine. During the heeling pattern two shots are fired from a starter pistol to test the dog's sound sensitivity. Later the dog must be heeled through a moving group of people. Dogs must retrieve large dumbbells on flat, over a 1 meter jump and an A Frame, and must be under voice control with no hand signals. Handler help is penalized, and may result in dismissal from the trial.

The protection phase tests a dog ability to react appropriately and be under control at all times. The dog must find a hidden decoy and hold him in place with strong barking without a bite. The dog must return to the handler when called, prevent escapes and attacks by biting, yet be able to immediately release the bite and bark or sit quietly at the handler's side. The dog and handler are required to heel next to the decoy, and transport him to the judge, yet remain ready for defense against an attack. Dogs that are out of control are dismissed, as well as dogs that do not release the bite.

Recently it has become possible to obtain titles in single phases, and a new Rescue Dog suitability title can be obtained at some trials. Rules for Schutzhund titles are based on internationally accepted rules. Judges are often brought from Europe, and The United Schutzhund Clubs of America maintains a judges program as well, licensing judges from within the organization.

United Schutzhund Clubs of America has developed a certification program for helpers, and nearly 400 have participated. This program involves attending seminars given by national teaching helpers, as well as written and practical testing of the helper's skills. A helper must demonstrate proper equipment, an understanding of the rules, and most importantly, the ability to move and catch each dog safely. Helper classifications range from basic to national levels, and after each trial, a helper's performance is critiqued by the presiding judge, and noted in his Helper Book. This promotes fair testing of the dogs and vigilance with regards to safety.

USA also offers conformation shows, where the physical attributes of a dog are judged against the international standard. Dogs may be shown as puppies, allowing a chance for those with very young dogs to participate, and classes extend up to adult dogs with Schutzhund titles showing in the conformation ring. This promotes breeding for correct and sound physical structure. Breeders are encouraged to adhere to strict standards, involving a show rating, a Schutzhund title, an endurance test, and an acceptable hip rating on each dog being bred. In many countries, litter registration is not permitted unless the parents have met these criteria. This promotes consistent quality of the dogs being bred, and allows potential buyers to review generations of hip ratings, conformation, and working titles. In America, USA is a strong proponent of this system, which originated with the SV in Germany.

Why is Schutzhund important to the future of the working breeds? A dog that performs well in Schutzhund should demonstrate a solid temperament with a foundation of intelligence and utility. He will show a high level of trainability and happiness for his tasks. These traits are highly sought after in police K9s and Search and Rescue dogs. By participating in Schutzhund, we are keeping an important genetic pool alive for the dogs which serve and protect us. It also allows owners opportunity to enjoy an internationally recognized sport with their dogs, creating a stronger bond, and a safe, well mannered member of society.




Copyright – United Schutzhund Clubs of America (USA).
Reproduction in whole or in part permitted with proper attribution to the USA.
Article written by Christine Gajda of the USA’s General Education Committee.
For more information on Schutzhund or GSD activities,
please visit the USA website at
www.germanshepherddog.com and at www.usa-blog.org.




Read More...

Financial and Social Implications of Breed Specific Legislation

Compelling and interesting documentation well put together about BSL - primary focus on Canada, but filled with stories and statistics on 33 pages in pdf.

"Breed Specific Legislation (BSL) is the systematic targeting of arbitrarily determined dog breeds. Often BSL is the knee-jerk reaction to media reports and incidents, which resulted in an injury or fatality cause by a specific dog breed. BSL does not attempt to correct the problem of bad owners, but rather it punishes all individuals who choose to own a breed, which has become targeted by ill informed legislators.

Throughout the 20th and 21st Centuries a variety of dog breeds have been targeted as vicious breeds and subject to legislation and targeted media reports. Several of the targeted breeds included the Doberman Pinscher, the German Shepherd, Saint Bernard and Rottweiler.
Any dog, which is known to be a threat to public health and safety should be properly restrained, confined, and, when warranted, destroyed. As dog bites are indicative of an individual dog’s nature or upbringing, to pre-determine that a particular breed is more susceptible to biting is a hard to substantiate claim.

As a result of a breed ban in France, individuals sought out a replacement for their watchdogs. Rather than choose another dog breed, they smuggled Barbary Apes into the country to act as watchdogs as the apes are extremely strong, have sharp teeth, and are very short tempered.

Breed-specific legislation has several weaknesses including vague identification standards as well as under and over inclusiveness. Breed specific legislation targets all dogs which may have the physical characteristics of the targeted breed. The use of a set of standards to eliminate a dog, which meets 50% of any standard, could result in non-banned dogs being subject to muzzles, isolation, destruction or abandonment by their owners. In several jurisdictions, it is the owner’s responsibility to identify the breed of their dog during licensing and routine veterinary examinations, which further complicates the identification process. The question then arises: which standards does a jurisdiction use – a physical attributes test, a behavioral test, the use of expert breeders to determine breed, or non-experts. Breed bans should not be used as a quick fix. The solution lies with effective animal control and enforcement, responsible owners, education programs, reputable breeders, and reliable data."

Read more

Read More...

Tuesday, March 6, 2007

Schutzhund and the German Shepherd Dog

Schutzhund and the German Shepherd Dog

These are the graphics that are being currently considered for inclusion with the informational piece, Schutzhund and the German Shepherd Dog, being developed by Christine. More maybe needed and contributions are welcome.




These are of K-9 Griff. He is a cross-trained Patrol/Cadaver K-9 , Certified in the State of Ohio. He is a member of the 12 dog K-9 Unit of the Summit County Sheriff's Office and is handler by Deputy Kathy Wilmoth. He is also SchH3, FH2.
.............................

These are of K-9 Lucca. He is a Patrol K-9 Certified in the State of Ohio. He is a member of the 12 dog Unit of the Summit County Sheriff's Office and is handled by Tim Wilmoth who is the K-9 Trainer/Coordinator of the K-9 Unit. He is also V rated, SchH3, KKL1a
.............................
The tracking dog is Fritz, SchH3, HIC, CGC (HOT), owned by Christine Gajda
.............................


The SAR dog is K9 NeroVA-TF 1 (Virginia Task Force I), FEMA, OFDA (Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance)SARDOM (Search and Rescue Dogs of Maryland)Fairfax Search Dogs, owned by Elizabeth Kreitler
.............................

The dog in the blind is Stuka vom Enckhausen SchH3, Kkl1,HOT owned by Nate Harves.
.............................
The dog jumping the hurdle is Stuka vom Enckhausen SchH3, Kkl1, HOT owned by Nate Harves.
.............................
Dog is Stuka vom Enckhausen SchH3, Kkl1, HOT owned by Nate Harves
.............................
V Kim vom Schloss Weitmar, SchH3, KKl1, owned by Ken Simsic
.............................
Dog is Fritz, SchH3, HIC, CGC, (HOT)

photo by Christine Gajda





Read More...

Monday, March 5, 2007

Statewide Spay and Neuter Bill Introduced in California Legislature

Statewide Spay and Neuter Bill Introduced in California Legislature

Monday, March 05, 2007]

California Assemblyman Lloyd Levine introduced the "California Healthy Pets Act" (AB 1634) on Friday, February 23rd. This proposed legislation will require that all cats and dogs over the age of four months must be spayed or neutered unless the owner acquires an intact animal permit. Failure to comply with the provisions of the bill carries a civil penalty of $500 for each animal for which a violation occurs.

Read more from this AKC alert.

Read More...

Sunday, March 4, 2007

New Mexico Bill to Make Spay and Neuter Mandatory

Wednesday, February 14, 2007]

New Mexico House Bill 1106, known as the Pet Owner Responsibility Act, has been introduced by Representative Gutierrez and has been assigned to the Judiciary and Appropriations & Finance Committees. If this bill is adopted, all dogs six months of age or older must be spayed or neutered. While the bill currently provides exceptions for certain breeders, fanciers, and handlers, the bill would have a profound impact on all dog owners in New Mexico. The Judiciary Committee will consider this bill Friday, February 16, at 1:30PM. It is imperative that concerned dog owners and breeders contact their Representative and the committee members to express their opposition.

For more details click here for the AKC alert.

Read More...

Kentucky Bill Aims to Protect Rights of Breeders and Owners

What a quirk. We now have a state protecting the rights of Breeders.


Thursday, February 15, 2007]

Kentucky House Bill 375, introduced by Representative Webb, has been referred to the House Committee on Local Government but has not yet been set for a hearing. It seeks to protect the rights of breeders and owners by limiting what local governments can prohibit or regulate in regards to dogs. It is vital that breeders and owners contact their representative to express their support of this measure.

For more information as posted in this AKC alert; please click here

Read More...

Friday, February 9, 2007

Implanted Microchips Cause Cancer

Article by Jane Williams
December 20, 2006

Click
here for the link


Click on the back arrow key of your browser to return to the Blog

Read More...

We need humor too...

This has to be one of the best "singles" ads ever printed.
It is reported to have been listed in the Atlanta Journal.
SINGLE BLACK FEMALE seeks male companionship, ethnicity unimportant. I'm a very good girl who LOVES to play. I love long walks in the woods, riding in your pickup truck, hunting, camping and fishing trips, cozy winter nights lying by the fire. Candlelight dinners will have me eating out of your hand. I'll be at the front door when you get home from work, wearing only what nature gave me.
Call (404) 875-6420 and ask for Daisy, I'll be waiting ....




Over 15,000 men found themselves talking to the Atlanta Humane Society

Read More...

Monday, February 5, 2007

New Bill affecting New York State

Please check the AKC alert relating to a New York Bill which Will Impose Mandatory Microchipping and Enrollment in State Registry.

Click here

Click on the back arrow key of your browser to return to the Blog

Read More...

Saturday, January 27, 2007

Doing Your Homework

The Search for a Breeder
By Christine Gajda
(originally published in USA magazine, Jan/Feb 2007)


The decision to purchase a German Shepherd Dog can lead a potential owner into a confusing maze of questions and promises. What should be a happy, stree-free event can often turn into a perplexing puzzle. Considering that the lifespan of a German Shepherd will be 10 years or more, this is certainly a decision not to be taken lightly. Poor choice of a breeder can leave you with an unhealthy dog or one with poor or questionable temperament. Finding a good breeder takes time and research, but it is well worth the effort. In buying a dog you are entering into a relationship with the dog's breeder. Their knowledge and choice of breeding stock, as well as 'customer support' after the dog goes home with you can prove to be a blessing or a curse! The following guidelines can help a potential buyer find a responsible breeder that best suits their needs.
KNOW YOUR BREED. Knowing the breed standard is a MUST! Not only will it help you ask intelligent questions of the breeder, it will help you 'read' their answers. Furthermore, recognize that there are many 'types' of the same breed, beyond the concept of working lines and showlines. Many countries have taken the breed in slightly different directions, and being aware of that will help you find a dog that suits your purposes.
KNOW YOUR QUESTIONS. Formulate a list of questions that you feel are important, and write them out to take with you when you meet the breeder. A responsible breeder will appreciate your thoroughness and not be offended. It is all too easy to get sidetracked when viewing kennels and dogs. It is important that you ask clear questions, and get clear answers. A good breeder will be happy to spend time with you answering your questions, as they will be looking for the best possible homes for their pups. Some important questions to include are:
Can I meet the parents of the litter? Your pup will inherit not only physical characteristics, but temperament as well. Meeting the sire and dam will help give you an idea of what you may have in your home in a few years. If possible, ask to see them work as well.
Are the parents certified to be free of hip dysplasia, and how far back does the certification go? Some registries require this certification, while others do not, but a responsible breeder will NOT breed dogs that are not certified. There is no guarantee that all pups will be free of hip problems, as there are a multitude of contributing factors, but only breeding certified parents reduces the risk of problems. Ask for the OFA or other certification numbers (such as the "a" stamp), and verify them on your own. Unscrupulous breeders may lay claim to certifications and titles that do not exist. This is research time well spent.
How old is the dam? Just because a female is able to produce puppies, does not mean that she should. Breeding a female either too young or too old is a sign of a breeder that is more interested in money than proper breeding practices.
How do you socialize your pups? A good breeder will have a well thought out plan for early socialization. The pups need a variety of regular human contacts, with people of all ages and sizes, as well as exposure to different surfaces to walk on, various noises, objects and situations. Pups should not spend all of their time in their kennel with their littermates.
Can I see the kennel? The entire kennel area should be available to see, and responsible breeders should be happy to show you their clean, humane facilities.
How many dogs are on site, and how many people do you employ? A high dog to human ratio implies that the dogs, although possible clean and well fed, are largely left to themselves. This is especially important when purchasing a puppy, when early human contact is of utmost priority.
Are you involved with showing, training, and titling your dogs and your clients' dogs? This is a sign of commitment to the breed beyond producing puppies, and allows a breeder to better know their dogs' strengths and weaknesses, as well as their temperaments. It furthermore shows commitment to continuing education about the breed and how it is developing, as well as confidence in the quality of their stock and the pups they produce. Ask to come watch a training session, and observe how the dogs work and are handled.
Why did you choose to breed these two particular dogs, and how do they compliment each other? A good breeder should have well thought out breeding choices, beyond choosing the most recent winner at a national event or Seiger show. They should be able to explain the rationale for their breeding choices in detail, not just try to impress you with the accomplishments of either parent.
KNOW YOUR TITLES. Breeders love to list their dogs' titles and awards, and certainly they are worth noting. Keep in mind however, that not all letters following a dog's name are equal - some denote temperament certificates, AKC titles (such as obedience, rally, and agility), flyball titles, instinct testing and certificates, and so on. The working titles from different countries and organizations alone can create confusion, as essentially the same routines can appear to be different titles (such as SchH, VPG, IPO, ZVV). Every title has it's place, but don't be fooled by a long list of letters surrounding a dog's name. Research what they mean. Determine what is important for you and what you plan to do with your dog.
KNOW YOUR PAPERS AND THE PROCESS INVOLVED IN GETTING THEM. If your dog is whelped in the United States, you will need AKC papers. AKC papers are not an assurance of quality, but simply a way of proving that your dog is purebred. They are also required for entry in many events. If you leave the breeder without the application of individual registration in hand, there is no guarantee that you will ever receive it. The AKC will not intervene in a breeder-client dispute, as it is simply a registry. If a breeder either decides to withhold or is ultimately unable to provide papers for your dog, it is a matter for a lawyer, not the AKC, and one that is not settled cheaply. Furthermore, many breeders sell their pups on limited registration. Be sure that you understand their reasoning, and that you are willing to accept that it may never be lifted. Lastly, there are many complicated scenarios involving imports and breedings outside of the United States that can delay the process of receiving papers. Ask for details and timelines, and realize that there are risks involved. Ethical breeders always deliver their papers, but you should make yourself aware of all details relating to your purchase.
KNOW HOW YOU WILL BE CHOOSING YOUR PUP. A good breeder is just as concerned with which pup you take home as you are, and will make every effort to make a good match. They will ask as many questions of you as you do of them, and should be able to describe what they have observed about various pups in the litter. They should be open to you spending time observing and testing the pups, and should have no problem with you bringing someone along with you to help select the pup, should you desire to do so.
KNOW YOUR CONTRACT. All reputable breeders will offer you a written contract, and it should be available for preview before you put a deposit on a pup. If you desire, you should be able to take a copy home with you to re-read. Many breeders post their contracts on their websites. The contract should be in plain, understandable terms, and not in need of excessive explanation. If you have questions, the breeder should offer clear answers and should be willing to put the clarifications in writing if you ask.
KNOW YOUR GUARANTEES. Most responsible breeders will offer replacement guarantees on dogs which evidence genetic problems such as crippling hip dysplasia. Know the fine points, such as where the diagnosis must be made and in what time frame, how the breeder must be notified, and if the dog must be returned in order to receive a replacement. Even if this is explained to you, it should be in writing, and signed by both parties. Ask if there are provisions in the event that a dog purchased for a specific purpose develops a physical flaw that prevents it's intended use (example, a 'top show puppy' that develops a disqualifying overbite). Good breeders ALWAYS stand behind the pups they produce, keep in mind however, that no breeder should be responsible for owner negligence, and most breeders have clauses to that effect.
KNOW YOUR LOCAL CLUBS. This will prove to be one of the best resources a potential buyer can find. Club members will be thrilled to share their good experiences with a breeder, and will warn you of bad ones. You may be able to see or hear about specific dogs that the breeder has produced that are older and achieving titles. This is time well spent. You will also get an idea of the kind of breeder support you may receive after purchase.
KNOW YOUR CHANCES. Call the Better Business Bureau. Call the AKC. Call the governing organizations for your breed. Ask if there have been complaints filed against a particular breeder. Chances are, there haven't been, but if there were, it's best to know in advance that someone was disgruntled enough to file a formal complaint. This doesn't indicate that the breeder is bad (the buyer may have been at fault), however, it does indicate that further research is needed.
Buying a pup should never be an impulse, quick decision, but rather done as a commitment to the dog for its lifetime. Taking the extra time to research prior to purchase greatly improves your chances of getting a dog that is right for your personality, lifestyle, and goals. There are extensive resources available to potential buyers, and it is important to utilize as many of them as possible. Hopefully the end result will be that the breeder, the buyer, and of course the dog (!) have a happy, long lasting relationship.

Read More...

Kids and Dogs, Are They Made for Each Other?

By Christine Gajda
(originally published in USA magazine, May/June 2006)


Today the sport of Schutzhund is experiencing a rise in the number of so-called family dogs that are participating in the sport. Many of the dogs that we see at training are also housedogs that live with families with young children. The ideal Schutzhund dog has solid nerve and temperament, is not a menace to society, and is safe around people and children. With the constant threat of breed bans and common misconceptions about the sport, it is more important than ever to educate our children about appropriate behavior around dogs, and to insist that our canines are good citizens and examples of the breed. While many ideas are discussed below, most of them can be summed up in one word: supervision.
As the leader of your home, it is your job to ensure that everyone behaves appropriately. Dogs and kids LOVE mischief, and can make quite a formidable team digging up gardens, eating food between meals, redecorating the house with toys, and all sorts of other forbidden activities. It's nice to know you can safely "leave the dog and the kids in the backyard together", but don't be surprised when they have redesigned the landscaping. Also very important to remember is that dogs are by nature social climbers, and children in your absence may behave entirely differently than when you are around. Who will be the boss in your absence? Dogs should never be the leader, and young children cannot. Keep the situations where your children and dogs are together under control and predictable, not just in their actions together, but even more importantly in their interaction with each other. If you take a break from being the leader, someone WILL fill your spot.
Don't allow children to take advantage of a dog's tolerance. Children are small, make quick sudden moves, fall unexpectedly, and may on occasion do many things quite innocently that can be threatening to a dog. It is wonderful to see a dog with a solid temperament that does not react, however, just because a dog will tolerate any and all actions does not mean that he should be expected to on a daily basis. A teething toddler may innocently bite a dog's ear. Kids may fall on the dog, run and jump over him, step on tails, all without malice, but they should not be allowed to do so, simply because the dog will tolerate it. It is wonderful to realize that your dog is a saint, but this is nothing to brag about ("My dog will take anything my kids dish out…" is heard all too often) as it shows a serious lack of supervision and poor attitude of disrespect for the dog.
Children should be taught to treat others - INCLUDING animals - with respect. It is the parents' job to instruct and enforce appropriate and considerate behaviors. Conversely, do not allow a dog to take advantage of a child's small stature. This includes allowing the dog to take things, such as toys and food, from the child, and being allowed to run boisterously through the house knocking small children over. A dog that lives in the house must possess manners.
Pay attention to your dog's health. An ear infection or cut paw may make a dog less tolerant than normal. A dog with arthritis may have mood swings dependant on the weather. A female in season may react differently than normal because of hormonal changes. Children will not necessarily understand this, and paying attention to your dog's health will minimize the risk of any abnormal reaction to a child by the dog. If a dog that is normally appropriate around children begins showing strange behaviors, take time to analyze what has changed. Could there be a medical issue? Perhaps a trip to the vet is in order. Obviously the dog could simply be "pulling rank", but a dog that is physically uncomfortable or in pain will show it in how he reacts to what normally is not a problem.
People have children, and children have friends. Remember that not all children who visit your home are comfortable around dogs. Likewise, not all children who visit your home know appropriate behavior around dogs. Your presence will help make the visit positive for all. Your dog is your responsibility, and this can be a fantastic opportunity to educate others about appropriate behavior around dogs. If the visitors are unreceptive, don't allow your dog or children to be placed in an uncomfortable situation. Do not allow other people's children to inadvertently intimidate or harass your dog. Out of fairness to your dog, do not place him in a position that he is forced to react, and then will be labeled "mean" by the neighbor's kids. When in doubt, crate the dog!
Watch for warning signs that a dog may give that a child will not pick up on - a stiffened posture, direct stare, hackles up, teeth showing, or growl. Be aware of what prompted the reaction, and deal with it accordingly. Also watch for innocent gestures that a child may make, that a dog may see as threatening. Running top speed through the house in full Darth Vader costume waving a toy light saber may be great fun for your child, but could easily startle and threaten for a sleeping dog. Being aware of what your children and dogs are doing minimizes and risk for "misunderstandings". If your children are ready for some wild play, and the dog is sleeping, crate the dog! Everyone will be happier.
Teach your children to respect the training field. For the future of the sport and breed, it is imperative that children must be exposed to and involved with our sport. Schutzhund training days should be, whenever possible, a family affair. Club days, however, are a time that people come together to exchange ideas, proof their dogs, try new skills, and prepare for trials. While having children around can provide excellent distractions (one never knows when children will be present at a trial or show), children should not be permitted to interfere with what club members are attempting to do with their dogs. Loud, boisterous behavior can easily interfere with both a handler's and a dog's focus. Additionally, children need supervision to keep them a proper distance from the training field, especially when dogs are working off lead. Although many club members may be willing to help, parents that bring their children to training, trials and shows should be primarily responsible for their supervision - it should not become a group babysitting experience. Training, although enjoyable, is also serious and should be treated as such and respected. Supervising your children makes them welcome at all events.
On the opposite side of this, for those who do not have children at training, remember that the children of today are the dog owners, voters, and legislators of tomorrow. Keep your behavior towards fellow club members and their dogs respectful. Frustrations in training should not result in a barrage of swearing. If someone's children are distracting you, let them know and ask them to keep their children quiet. Nothing is gained by "dealing with it" and then complaining later to other club members. Having clear club rules about what is expected if children are present at training goes a long way toward preventing problems. Another issue important to all of us in the sport is cleaning up after your dog. This is an issue not only of common courtesy that should be standard with all dog owners, but of is of extra importance if there are small children around.
Involving your children in the dog's care is a wonderful way to teach responsibility to your children, and additionally helps the dog maintain a proper place in the pack. This being said, however, do not place sole responsibility for the dog's care in the child's hands. Children live with their parents for a reason: they are not able to care for themselves. One can logically infer that they are not able to care completely for another living being. Yes, they may be able to brush the dog on their own, or help with mealtimes, but the overall care of the dog must rest on the adult in the house. An adult must be responsible for recognizing when the dog needs to visit a vet, when a dog is eating too little or too much, or any of a myriad of subtle issues that can arise.
Even seemingly simple tasks such as brushing the dog or putting the food bowl on the ground should be supervised, to ensure that it is being done properly. (Note: a great way to have a child feed the dog is to have them ask for a "sitz" or "platz" before putting the food bowl on the ground - it reinforces their status in the pack, reinforces training, and also helps keep the dog from enthusiastically knocking the bowl out of the child's hands and spilling kibble all over. It must be supervised though, as the dog may not initially heed the child's command, and the child will most likely put the food on the ground anyway, thus rewarding ignoring a command!)
Just as we teach our children not to talk to strangers, we need to educate them on how to act around unfamiliar dogs, especially strays. Not all dogs are comfortable around children - quite frankly, not all dogs are comfortable around people. A dog that has been abused and hit may react negatively if a child reaches to pet its head. A dog that has had bad experiences with children may be wary or defensive with all children. Teach children not to run enthusiastically up to strange dogs. Teach children to always ASK FIRST before petting another person's dog.
Teach children what to do if a dog threatens them. Teach them that running and screaming can incite a chase - either in fun, or otherwise. Just as the one-in-a-million person may not have the best intentions toward a child, the same may apply to dogs. Not educating children for this possibility, however unlikely, is neglect. Children that grow up with a stable, well-mannered dog will often assume that all dogs are the same way.
Being a responsible parent and a responsible owner go hand in hand. Allowing either your children or your dogs to be unsupervised affects everyone, whether it is a neighbor that finds your dogs annoying, or the club member that dreads having your children around. What better example of the breed can be found than a dog that is strong on the protection field, yet still safe around children? And what better way to encourage the future of the sport than to welcome children with their parents at clubs? These are important, but as owners, parents, and club members, we all need to take responsibility that behaviors of everyone involved, in all situations - whether it be at home, training, or out in public - are supervised and managed to the benefit of everyone. REMEMBER: the children of today are the future dog owners, voters, and legislators of tomorrow.



Free coloring books about dog safety and care can be requested from Monster Dog Equipment,
www.monsterdog.net

Read More...

AKC Alert - Minnesota

MN Dog and Cat Breeders Act Aims to Regulate Breeders

Click here


Click on the back arrow key of your browser to return to the Blog

Read More...

Friday, January 26, 2007

THE DISASTER AREA OF DOG LEGISLATION

1/13/07

LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY - THE DISASTER AREA OF DOG LEGISLATION.

by Tina M. Perriguey, USA General Education Committee

Timing really is everything.

During the first week in January, Randall Hoadley, Vice-president of USA, and several key USA Committee members were engaged in intense communication involving the threat of Breed-specific Legislation to our sport, our organization and our German Shepherd Dogs. Pursuant to this dialogue, and with the approval of USA President, Lyle Roetemeyer, a proactive agenda for the General Education Committee was approved.



These positive steps signal a campaign to bring the strength of USA’s 5,000 members to this critical fight. In terms of an organized effort, the AWDF, Al Govednik, and the hard-working members of the AWDF Legislative Committee have been doing the “heavy lifting” in this fight for a long time. In kicking off 2007, USA extends them our sincere gratitude, and proof that we realize we’ve all got “skin in the game.”



And just in case any of our members were still willing to sit on the sidelines, Jerry Abramson comes along and raises the stakes.

In the second week of January, Louisville, Kentucky mayor Jerry Abramson signed into law an ordinance that is frightening on two levels. Not only is it draconian, but it doesn’t even bother to mount the pretense of discriminating against only “dangerous dogs.” This NON-breed-specific legislation applies to ALL dogs in Louisville, KY.

This is an ominous precedent, sport fans. Please go to the USA Website for updates on the fight against this and BSL across the nation.

HIGHLIGHTS OF THE 91-PAGE ORDINANCE...

1. Prong, chain and pinch collars are prohibited. (Yes, you and I know that prong and pinch collars are the same thing. The wording here is an indication of how much research was done before drafting this ordinance).

2. Nuisance Law: If any of your animals (not just dogs) "irritates" or "perturbs" anyone twice within a 5 year period, you will be forced to give up ALL of your animals and will be prohibited from owning animals again for two years.

3. You must have your dog/cat re-vaccinated against rabies and re-licensed EVERY TIME you remove it from a kennel/cattery. This includes boarding kennels.

4. If you break any law (including walking your dog off leash) your dog can be impounded and must be altered before you may reclaim it.

(Refresh my memory. What country are we living in? Did Communist China take over while we were too busy celebrating New Year’s to notice?)

5. ALL impounded dogs must be spayed/neutered. The Director has discretion to reduce fees/fines if you spay/neuter your animal. The Director cannot waive the requirement to have your impounded animal altered before that animal may be released.

6. All unaltered dogs must be microchipped. You may not keep your unaltered dog in a house in which the windows are open and only screens present to prevent the dog from exiting.

7. If you sell, give away, or board (yes, board) your unaltered dog, you must notify the Director. You may not purchase an unaltered dog without the written permission of the Metro Animal Services Director.

8. If you show your unaltered dog, and travel with it for more than 3 days, you must notify the Director as to the change in location of your unaltered dog. The owner of an unaltered dog shall not be changed without notification to the Director of Metro Animal Services.

9. If you own more than 3 dogs, and you live on less than half an acre, you are in violation of the ordinance. There is no grandfather clause.

10. If you own more than 7 dogs and you live on less than 2 acres, you are in violation of the ordinance. Again, no grandfather clause.

11. Breeders who maintain more than one unaltered pet must purchase a $300 animal dealer license as well as a $150 Class A kennel license to sell a litter of dogs. The required licenses allow Louisville Metro Animal Services to inspect the breeder’s premises at any reasonable time.

The Louisville Metro Council decided to draft the ordinance last year after dog attacks in which two people were killed. The provisions, signed by the mayor on January 4, 2007, were approved by the Louisville City Council by a 16-8 vote on December 19th.



Read More...