Monday, February 4, 2008

California Proposition 93 (Term Limits)

PLEASE CROSS POST IMMEDIATELY

As luck would have it, California will have an opportunity on Tuesday
February 5 to help rid the state legislature of some of the worst
proponents of anti-dog and anti-cat legislation. It is not just
constituents in their legislative districts who can vote these
extremists out. Every registered California voter has the
opportunity to vote them out.

Now is a critical time for those who oppose the radical Animal Rights
agenda to make it clear to politicians that we are a powerful
constituency, and that legislators who pander to the extremist AR
agenda will lose their jobs. We can send letters and faxes to make
our case, but what matters most is how we vote.

A NO vote on Proposition 93 is a vote to make sure Lloyd Levine terms
out at the end of 2008. Levine is the sponsor of the infamous AB
1634 mandatory spay/neuter bill.

A NO vote on Proposition 93 is a vote to make sure Fabian Núñez
terms out at the end of 2008. Núñez is the Speaker of the
Assembly. Had Núñez not twisted arms before the "do over" vote in
the Assembly, AB 1634 would have died for good last Spring.

A NO vote on Proposition 93 is a vote to make sure Loni Hancock terms
out at the end of 2008. Hancock sponsored a failed bill to ban the
several thousand year old tradition of field coursing with hounds.

A poll a few days ago showed Proposition 93 in a statistical tie.
Californians are waking up to the fact that Proposition 93 is bad.
Polls a few months ago had shown overwhelming support for it. But
the more Californians learn about Prop 93, the less support it has.

We only have two days remaining to spread the word.

If every Californian dedicated to preserving our rights as dog and
cat owners votes NO on Proposition 93 on February 5, and spreads the
word to others to do the same, that could be the decisive factor.

There are plenty of other good reasons to vote NO on Proposition 93:
- it is dishonestly worded to make it sound like it toughens
California's term limits, when in reality it weakens them - the
leadership that is promoting Proposition 93 promised it would be
paired with reform of California's corrupt and broken redistricting
process, but they broke that promise - it has a sweetheart clause that
allows even longer terms for Núñez and many others - newspapers on
the left and the right oppose Proposition 93
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20080125/news_lz1ed25bottom.html
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/01/15/ED66UF359.DTL

Laura Sanborn
http://saveourdogs.net

Read More...

Sunday, February 3, 2008

Reintroduced New Jersey Bill Bad News For Breeders

Given below are extracts from the AKC Alert -

Quote

Assemblyman Neil Cohen and Assemblywoman Joan Voss have introduced
Assembly Bill 1591, a bill which threatens the rights of responsible
breeders in New Jersey. This bill is a reintroduction of 2006's AB
3401. Fanciers, concerned dog owners, and responsible breeders should
immediately contact their representatives in the New Jersey State
Legislature, and the members of the Assembly Agriculture and Natural
Resources Committee who will first hear this bill, and express their
vehement opposition to this bill.



The bill defines a "breeder" as any person who sells or offers to sell
more than five puppies per year. In addition to this incredibly low
threshold, the bill requires breeders to comply with a host of
restrictive regulations and institutes steep fines for violations.

AB 1591 also prohibits any breeder from selling more than 25 dogs in one year.

AB 1591 goes far beyond encouraging responsible breeding. Under AB
1591, all breeders would be required to comply with draconian
regulations including maintaining specified temperatures, keeping
animals only on nonporous surfaces, and circulating air at precise
levels. The measure further mandates the acceptable dimensions for
crates and runs, and sets minimum socialization standards. Finally,
all breeders are required to register annually with the Department of
Health. This list will be published and made available to the public.

All breeders are required to furnish specified information to pet
purchasers and provide a full refund for any reason for a pet returned
within 14 days. Any dog which is sold with a pedigree can be returned
for a full refund within 26 months if any congenital or genetic
defects are discovered.

Violations can be punished with monetary fines or suspension of thelicense to sell pets. A first violation can result in a prohibition
on selling cats or dogs for five years and subsequent offenses can add
an additional five years for each violation. Civil penalties may also
be administered. For a first offense, a breeder shall be fined $5,000
and for a second offense the breeder may be fined $10,000 for each
subsequent offense. A member of the public who supplies information
that results in fines or suspension will be eligible for an award of
10 percent of the civil penalty or $250, whichever is greater.

unquote

WHAT YOU CAN DO:

Write to the following using the formats drafted by Jim Honda of the
USA at the request of Pedro Jiminez - Regional Director who are
orchestrating the efforts by the USA to defeat this legislation.

These formats are given below in the next posting.



Assemblywoman Joan M. Voss
District 38
520 Main Street
Fort Lee, NJ 07024

Assemblyman Neil M. Cohen, Esquire
District 20 (Union)
985 Stuyvesant Avenue
Union, NJ 07083


Assemblyman Douglas H. Fisher, Chair
14 East Commerce St.
3rd Floor
Bridgeton, NJ 08302
(856) 455-1011

Assemblyman Nelson Albano, Vice-Chair
21 North Main St.
Cape May Court House, NH 08210
(609) 465-0700


Assemblyman John F. Amodeo


Assemblyman Herb Conaway, Jr.
Delran Professional Center
Suite 125
8008 Route 130 North
Delran, NJ 08075
(856) 461-3997


Assemblywoman Marcia A. Karrow
1 Maple Avenue
Flemington, NJ 08822
(908) 782-5127


Contact your own state Assemblyperson and Senator. Express your
opposition to AB 1591, and urge them to do the same. To find out who
represents you in the New Jersey State Assembly and State Senate, go
to http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/
districts/municipalities.asp.

end




Read More...

Saturday, February 2, 2008

Letters to protest - New Jersey Bill

Example of Letter to be sent to each legislative member.
Drafted by Jim Honda Esquire

Please copy and change as appropriate


TO BE SENT TO ASSEMBLYMAN COHEN FROM NJ RESIDENTS

January 30, 2008

Assemblyman Neil M. Cohen, Esquire
District 20 (Union)
985 Stuyvesant Avenue
Union, NJ 07083

By: USPS, Email and Fax To Both Your Office and Law Firm

Re: Bill A1591 –WITHDRAW IT, PLEASE!!

Dear Assemblyman Cohen:

I am a New Jersey resident who has compiled this correspondence to
record my opposition to the above-referenced proposed legislation and
to offer the reasoning therefore with the hope that you will withdraw
same.

Rather than offering a vacuous and unascertainable statement that many
of your constituents in this state share the same sentiment as me, I
have asked concerned citizens from both the state of NJ and beyond its
borders to contact you and your peers in the assembly regarding this
so that you can personally measure the vehement opposition to this
bill. In addition, since I feel so passionately that your
well-intended legislation is misguided and improper, I have asked a
number of national working and service dog organizations for support
and publicity of this issue and soon, this cause will be espoused and
featured on well-perused websites.

After several careful readings of your bill, I surmise that your
legislative intent is to:

- ensure the health and well-being of dogs, puppies, cats and kittens
- to increase the chances of consumers who buy dogs, puppies, cats and
kittens in NJ of buying a "quality" pet, one that is free of
communicable diseases and congenital defects.


Again, your legislative intent is commendable, but your actions are
misguided because:

New Jersey law ALREADY provides consumers protection in the form of
the Pet Purchase Protection Act of 1999 (aka The Puppy Lemon
Law—Assembly # 960, 208th Legislature, Adopted 3/11/1999)



The New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs (see Subchapter 12 of
N.J.A.C. 13:45A-1 et seq. and N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 et seq., Consumer Fraud
Act.) also has jurisdiction to afford aggrieved pet purchasers with a
remedy

The Department of Health and Senior Services already provides a list
of licensed kennels and pet shops.

I understand that your bill attempts to provide further protections by
providing additional requirements and narrower definitions both
numerically and in terms of the vernacular, but with all due respect,
your bill will not achieve any of the purposes you seek to attain. The
problem cannot be solved with more legislation, Assemblyman Cohen. The
problem can only be solved by educating the public so that consumers
who purchase puppies are cognizant of what to look for and what
questions to ask. Once consumers are educated about what constitutes a
good dog, puppy, cat or kitten, they will naturally purchase from
legitimate and principled breeders who care about quality. Once
consumers are educated, they will be less likely to purchase on a whim
from a pet store located on a well-traversed highway or through a
newspaper or bulletin board advertisement designed specifically to
entice the uneducated consumer. Once consumers are educated even pet
stores on well-traversed highways will have no choice but to work with
ethical breeders when selling puppies. At this time, as we know, even
with the legislation in effect, puppy mill- bred pups are offered for
sale throughout our fine state.

Education can be a key ally in your cause but it is obvious that you
do not consider it important. Fines imposed under your legislation
would go to an Animal Population Control Fund and the Department of
Health but none would go directly towards setting up any type of Board
or Program that would encourage responsible pet owning practices.

Your legislation is actually (and literally) dangerous because:

- limiting a person to selling 25 dogs focuses on an arbitrary and
capricious number rather than on quality.

- placing a 25 dog limitation will deprive some of a source of
livelihood and others of a source of income. This will inure to the
benefit of out of state competitors who are not subject to such a
limitation.

- Your legislation would be adhered to by law-abiding citizens and
entities but circumvented by conniving unscrupulous individuals and
organizations in the form of shell companies, fictitious persons, etc.
The person who does not have the common decency to properly care and
feed for a puppy or puppies has the same propensity to circumvent the
law.

- Placing an eight week limit on puppies offered for sale is just
insane. Do you realize how many puppies that have turned into stellar
working dogs would not have seen week 10 if your draconian bill was
passed and enforced? Surely, you cannot have intended this! Would the
child that takes too long to understand algebra be sentenced to an
orphanage or gas chamber? No!

Assemblyman Cohen: The answer lies in educating the public. Your
efforts, time and money would be better spent on education:

- Inform consumers about the various theories of good breeding practices


- Inform consumers on the value of researching breeds and their
propensities in terms of physical size and temperament


- Inform consumers how beneficial it is to see the parents (sire and dam)


- Inform consumers how beneficial it is to talk with veterinarians,
dog owners, clubs, etc. PRIOR to purchase


- Inform consumers that there are a multitude of organizations that
promote performance (SAR, Agility, Herding, etc.) and conformation
(OFA, conformation shows, etc).


- Promote dog owners to obtain titles such as CGC (Canine Good
Citizen), BH (schutzhund) Therapy Dog and the like.

Once educational efforts permeate the public, the rotten apples will
naturally disappear. It is already obvious that legislation, alone,
has little to no impact since the unscrupulous are undeterred by it
since they find ways to circumvent it.

By this correspondence, I offer not only my opposition but my offer to
help should you wish to pursue alternative methods to obtaining what
we both want: the enjoyment of pets by the general public without the
grief, stress and loss of wages due to unnecessary vet bills, etc.

Thank you for your kind attention herein.


Sincerely,


______________________________________
(Name)

______________________________________
Contact Info)





Read More...

Friday, February 1, 2008

Mandatory L.A Spay/Neuter Ordinance Passes

Dear Lyle,

Today a mandatory/spay neuter ordinance mandating sterilization at 4
months of age was passed by the Los Angeles City Council. The
supporters of this bill including PETA, Assemblymember Lloyd Levine
and Campaign Director Judie Mancuso are now moving to pass AB 1634, a
statewide mandatory/spay neuter bill for California.

PetPAC is announcing today a renewed campaign effort to defeat AB 1634
once and for all. As opponents of mandatory sterilization laws, we
must act immediately to stop these efforts to strip away the rights of
pet owners.

Our opponents have recently raised millions of dollars to take away
pet owners rights…today I am asking PetPAC members to once again
contribute so we can continue the fight to defeat AB 1634.

One of the arguments used to pass the mandatory spay/neuter ordinance
in Los Angeles was to prohibit ANY new dogs or cats from being born
until the shelters were emptied. Our opponents include radical
extremists who wish for the elimination of all family pets. Please
don't delay, we need your financial contribution today. Thank
you.Sincerely,

Bill Hemby
Chairman

P.S. Please contribute today and forward this message to your friends
and family.

Read More...

Virginia - HB 1570, Companion animals; sterilization; penalty

THIS LETTER WAS ADDRESSED INDIVIDUALLY TO THE ENTIRE 22 MEMBERS OF THE VIRGINIA HOUSE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE, CHESAPEAKE, AND NATURAL RESOURCES WITH THE LETTERS SENT AS EMAIL ATTACHMENTS. HOPED THERE MIGHT BE SOME DISCUSSIONS IN THE HALLWAYS. IT WAS ALSO FAXED TO THE MEMBERS WHO WERE ON THE AGRICULTURE SUBCOMMITTEE, SINCE THAT WAS THE COMMITTEE IT WAS REFERRED TO VERY LATE IN THE GAME.

AGAIN, SARA AND LYLE HAVE REPRESENTED THE USA APPROPRIATELY IN THE FIGHT AGAINST BSL.




January 26, 2008




The Honorable Harvey B. Morgan, Chairman
House Committee on Agriculture, Chesapeake, and Natural Resources
General Assembly Building
P.O. Box 406
Richmond, VA 23218

Subject: HB 1570, Companion animals; sterilization; penalty

Dear Delegate Morgan:

The United Schutzhund Clubs of America (USA) opposes HB 1570, which would mandate spay/neuter of nearly all dogs and cats in the Commonwealth of Virginia. This bill is based on a fundamentally flawed concept that has never worked anywhere.

The United Schutzhund Clubs of America was founded in 1975, and is a member club of the American Working Dog Federation. We have over 4,500 members nationally, with five clubs in Virginia. Our membership is comprised of sport dog enthusiasts, trainers, breeders, and families. We are dedicated to breeding, raising, and training working- and show-quality German Shepherd Dogs; and we offer working titles such as Schutzhund (tracking/obedience/protection), RH (search dog suitability), and HGH (herding). These titles demonstrate the working ability of the dogs. These dogs are used as police, military, explosive detection, narcotics detection, fire accelerant detection, border patrol, search and rescue, guide, and service dogs assisting the physically challenged members of our society. They are also used for the sport of Schutzhund and as treasured family companions.

The intent of HB 1570 is to reduce the number of dogs and cats in shelters. We contend, however, that it will not achieve that purpose, will be unenforceable, and will penalize responsible dog owners and breeders. Mandatory spay/neuter laws have proven ineffective in reducing shelter intakes or euthanasia rates in other parts of the country. There is no example of a mandatory spay/neuter law that has reduced shelter intake or euthanasia rates, though proponents try to spin the numbers and claim otherwise. HB 1570 will not save money; it will add bureaucracy and cost local jurisdictions and taxpayers more money.



San Mateo County, CA had the nation's first mandatory spay/neuter law. It was admitted to be a "disappointment" by its biggest backer, the Peninsula Humane Society. The PHS learned from experience that mandatory spay/neuter laws are ineffective, so they do not support a law that would impose it statewide in California. Los Angeles saw their animal control costs increase by 269% after they passed mandatory spay/neuter. Unfortunately, they still kill tens of thousands of dogs and cats each year.

The actual results of the Santa Cruz County, CA mandatory spay/neuter program are far different than those touted by the proponents of mandatory spay/neuter. The official statistics sent by Santa Cruz County to the California Department of Health Services do not match the claimed 60%+ decrease in shelter impounds between 1995 and 2003. There was only a modest 8% decrease in impounds for dogs, while impounds statewide dropped 17%. Santa Cruz shelter expenses nearly doubled since mandatory spay/neuter law took effect, increasing 93% while the state average for shelter expenses decreased 10%.

United Schutzhund Clubs of America – 2 – January 26, 2008


Over the same period, without mandatory spay/neuter laws, El Dorado, Mendocino, Monterey, Nevada, Placer, and Ventura counties all showed substantially greater reductions in the number of dogs euthanized
than did Santa Cruz, led by Nevada County with an 89% reduction. Passage of HB 1570 would eliminate the voluntary programs that have been so successful in many local jurisdictions.

The vast majority of responsible breeders of working dogs are not breeding for monetary gain. On the contrary, they dedicate their lives to this very demanding work, often at great financial sacrifice. HB 1570 appears on the surface to have reasonable exemptions for these responsible breeders, but it does not. A “hobby breeder” may only breed one litter, while responsible hobby breeding involves more than a single litter. A “fancier breeder” must prove they show in certain sanctioned dog competitions on a regular basis, with no definition of what is “regular.” A “breed improver” has to prove they do not derive income from breeding, but it is not realistic or advisable for any breeder to give away puppies for free. Even if the bill is amended to state the breeder must not derive net income, it will still be unrealistic because a dog owner would be required to submit the audited financial records of the breeder’s breeding program. This is not realistic or workable.

Police canines are vital tools for law enforcement, and many police departments are expanding their units.
The demand for explosive detection dogs skyrocketed after 9/11 and cannot currently be met. One police K9 handler stated that if she was given 1,000 suitable dogs, she could place them all immediately. These dogs are critically needed to fight terrorism in this country and elsewhere. Working dog breeders produce the dogs used for the various types of search and rescue activities, and a decrease in the availability of these dogs will bring with it an attendant reduction in the number of successful searches. Passage of legislation such as HB 1570 would decimate the availability of these types of dogs that contribute so much to us.

It is impossible to measure the contributions of a search and rescue dog that finds a lost child, a police service dog that keeps its handler from being injured or killed, a narcotics detection dog that intercepts a shipment of drugs, a military dog that guards our bases, the explosives detection dog working against terrorism, or a service dog that helps a physically-challenged person lead an independent life. These remarkable canines make an enormous contribution to their owners, handlers, and society. We hope you will not be part of the process that eliminates these canines from your state.

Rather than impose a strategy such as mandatory spay/neuter that has failed everywhere it has been attempted, the Commonwealth of Virginia should leverage the success that Charlottesville, VA has had in its animal shelters. This is the No Kill Equation as advanced by the No Kill Advocacy Center. Charlottesville, VA is saving 92% of the dogs and cats admitted to its open admissions shelter, making it a leader in a nation that routinely kills 50% of dogs and cats admitted. This success can only be accomplished when animal lovers within a community work cooperatively to save lives. This cooperative spirit has never occurred, and cannot occur, when government attempts to impose draconian spay/neuter mandates on dog and cat owners. These laws divide the community of animal lovers, and make No Kill success impossible.

The United Schutzhund Clubs of America strongly objects to HB 1570, as it will not achieve its intended purpose and will transgress the rights of law-abiding citizens. As has been clearly demonstrated with other mandatory spay/neuter laws, HB 1570 is impractical and would be ineffective in reducing the number of dogs and cats in shelters.

We respectfully ask that HB 1570 be either withdrawn or defeated. It cannot be fixed by amendments.

Very truly yours,

Lyle Roetemeyer


Read More...

Los Angeles - Mandatory Spay/Neuter Motion (CF #07-1212) – Oppose

The following letter was, in the interest of time, emailed to the 15 LA Council Members by our Secretary, Sara Wallick. Kudos to her and Lyle. One of the Council members did respond advising that he will read it before the sessions.Hope the others do to.



January 29, 2008


Los Angeles City Council
200 N. Spring Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012

Subject: Mandatory Spay/Neuter Motion (CF #07-1212) – Oppose

Dear Councilmember:

The United Schutzhund Clubs of America (USA) opposes CF #07-1212, which would mandate spay/ neuter of nearly all dogs and cats in the City of Los Angeles. This bill is based on a fundamentally flawed concept that has never worked anywhere.

The United Schutzhund Clubs of America was founded in 1975 and has over 4,500 members nationally, with 33 clubs in California. Our membership is comprised of sport dog enthusiasts, trainers, breeders, and families. We are dedicated to breeding, raising, and training working- and show-quality German Shepherd Dogs; and we offer working titles such as Schutzhund (tracking/obedience/protection), RH (search dog suitability), and HGH (herding). All of these titles demonstrate the working ability of the dogs, and are those used by the German Shepherd Dog breed club in Germany. These dogs are used as police, military, explosive detection, narcotics detection, fire accelerant detection, border patrol, search and rescue, guide, and service dogs assisting the physically challenged members of our society. They are also used for the sport of Schutzhund and as treasured family companions.

The intent of CF #07-1212 is to reduce the number of dogs and cats in shelters. Unfortunately, it will not achieve that purpose, will be unenforceable, and will penalize responsible dog owners and breeders. Mandatory spay/neuter laws have proven ineffective in reducing shelter intakes or euthanasia rates in other parts of the country. There is no example of a mandatory spay/neuter law that has reduced shelter intake or euthanasia rates, though proponents try to spin the numbers and claim otherwise. CF #07-1212 will not save money; it will add bureaucracy, cost taxpayers more money, and merely shift the suppliers to underground operations and/or other sources.

San Mateo County, CA had the nation's first mandatory spay/neuter law. It was admitted to be a "disappointment" by its biggest backer, the Peninsula Humane Society. The PHS learned from experience that mandatory spay/neuter laws are ineffective, so they do not support a law that would impose it statewide in California.



The actual results of the Santa Cruz County, CA mandatory spay/neuter program are far different than those touted by the proponents of mandatory spay/neuter. The official statistics sent by Santa Cruz County to the California Department of Health Services do not match the claimed 60%+ decrease in shelter impounds between 1995 and 2003. There was only a modest 8% decrease in impounds for dogs, while impounds statewide dropped 17%. Santa Cruz shelter expenses nearly doubled since mandatory spay/neuter law took effect, increasing 93% while the state average for shelter expenses decreased 10%.

United Schutzhund Clubs of America – 2 – January 29, 2008


Over the same period, without mandatory spay/neuter laws, El Dorado, Mendocino, Monterey, Nevada, Placer, and Ventura counties all showed substantially greater reductions in the number of dogs euthanized
than did Santa Cruz, led by Nevada County with an 89% reduction. Passage of CF #07-1212 would eliminate the voluntary programs that have been so successful in many local jurisdictions.

Police canines are vital tools for law enforcement, and many police departments are expanding their units.
The demand for explosive detection dogs skyrocketed after 9/11 and cannot currently be met. One police K9 handler stated that if she was given 1,000 suitable dogs, she could place them all immediately. These dogs are critically needed to fight terrorism in this country and elsewhere. Working dog breeders produce the dogs used for the various types of search and rescue activities, and a decrease in the availability of these dogs will bring with it an attendant reduction in the number of successful searches. Passage of legislation such as CF #07-1212 would decimate the availability of these types of dogs that contribute so much to us.

It is impossible to measure the contributions of a search and rescue dog that finds a lost child, a police service dog that keeps its handler from being injured or killed, a narcotics detection dog that intercepts a shipment of drugs, a military dog that guards the bases in California, the explosives detection dog working against terrorism, or a service dog that helps a physically-challenged person lead an independent life. These remarkable canines make an enormous contribution to their owners, handlers, and society.

The exemptions offered in CF #07-1212 are vague and will not protect these types of dogs or many of the other types of dogs that contribute so much to us. AB 1634 was strongly opposed by well over 25,000 law enforcement officers, the assistance dog organizations, stock dog organizations, veterinarians, working dog organizations, and breed organizations.

Rather than impose a strategy such as mandatory spay/neuter that has failed everywhere it has been attempted, the City of Los Angeles should leverage the successes achieved elsewhere. Charlottesville, Virginia has used the No Kill Equation as advanced by the No Kill Advocacy Center and is saving 92% of the dogs and cats admitted to its open admissions shelter, making it a leader in a nation that routinely kills 50% of dogs and cats admitted. Please visit the Save our Dogs website, which has a wealth of information on the health consequences of early spay/neuter, the opposition to AB 1634 by the California Veterinary Medical Association, the failures of this type of legislation in other locations, and a partial list of the dog organizations which also oppose this type of legislation.

The United Schutzhund Clubs of America strongly objects to CF #07-1212, as it will not achieve its intended purpose and will transgress the rights of law-abiding citizens. As has been clearly demonstrated with other mandatory spay/neuter laws, CF #07-1212 is impractical and would be ineffective in reducing the number of dogs and cats in shelters.

We respectfully ask that CF #07-1212 be either withdrawn or defeated. It cannot be fixed by amendments.

Very truly yours,

Lyle Roetemeyer
President




Read More...

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

UNOFFICIAL REPORT: VA HB1570 DIED IN SUBCOMMITTEE!!!

Folks!

I contacted the office of Virginia House Delegate Robert Hull 10
minutes ago. Delegate Hull is the sponsor of VA HB 1570 which proposes
the mandatory Spay/Neuter of all animals sold by all breeders.

I was verbally told by the staffer at delegate Hulls office that
"HB1570 DID NOT MAKE IT", and that "IT WILL NOT BE REINTRODUCED IN
THIS LEGISLATIVE SESSION".

I also contacted the office of Delegate Robert Orrock who is the
Chairman of the House subcommittee hearing this bill. Del. Orrocks
legislative aide, Renee Hudson, confirmed the above verbally to me and
added that "this bill will not be considered again this year".

This news remains to be officially confirmed and I will be checking on
that in the next few days.

HOWEVER I WISH TO THANK ALL OF YOU WHO RESPONDED IN ANYWAY POSSIBLE TO
BRING ABOUT THIS OUTCOME. Words do not begin to express my sense of
gratitude to all of you.

CONGRATULATIONS EVERYONE!!!

Ravi Iyer

Read More...

VOTE NO TO Virginia HB 1570

From
Ravi Iyer, MD, PhD


To
Delegate Robert Hull & Members of the Commonwealth of Virginia House &
Senate Committees on
Agriculture
Chesapeake
Natural Resources

Dear Virginia Delegates

I am calling your attention to Virginia House Bill 1570 offered for
consideration by the House by Delegate Robert Hull.

I categorically do not support this poorly thought out bill in its entirety!!!

This bill attempts to implement a policy that would have the same
effect as a mandatory spay/neuter policy without calling it as such.
Mandatory spay/neuter laws for dogs and cats have been imposed in
numerous jurisdictions across America. Despite claims to the contrary,
these laws have always been failures. There is no example of a
mandatory spay/neuter law that has reduced shelter intake or
euthanasia rates, though proponents try to spin the numbers and claim
otherwise. These laws have instead dramatically increased costs to
cash-strapped governments, with no public benefit.

Santa Cruz County, CA saw its animal control costs double since its
mandatory spay/neuter law went into effect.
San Mateo County, CA had the nation's first mandatory spay/neuter law.
It is as a "disappointment" by its biggest backer, the Peninsula
Humane Society. The PHS learned from experience that mandatory
spay/neuter laws don't work, so they no longer support a law that
would impose it statewide in California.
Los Angeles saw their animal control costs increase by 269% after they
passed a spay/neuter mandate. They still kill tens of thousands of
dogs and cats each year.
The purported rationale behind this bill appears to be to reduce the
burden on animal shelters. It attempts to do this by including
"dealers" under the umbrella of the current laws governing animal
shelters and other releasing agencies. The exemptions crafted in this
bill would criminalize large numbers of honest and ethical individuals
who are responsible owners of intact animals without in anyway
addressing the unethical individuals. It would also impose a huge
taxpayer burden to implement the provisions of this bill.

In HB 1570, it's not the owner of a dog or cat would have to satisfy
an exemption, but rather the breeder of this dog or cat who has to
provide the documented proof. The bill's exemptions are all based not
on what kind of dog or cat owner the individual may be, but rather
what kind of breeder the dog or cat came from. If the breeder doesn't
provide this intrusive and unprecedented proof that they are one of
the breeders that HB 1570 exempts, or doesn't do it to the
satisfaction of your local Animal Control authorities, the individual
will be required to spay/neuter their dog or cat.

HB 1570 provides for exemptions for dogs and cats that were bred by a
"hobby breeder", "breed improver", or "fancier breeder" that fall
apart on closer inspection.

A "hobby breeder" can only breed one litter. After that, the exclusion
wouldn't apply. Serious and responsible hobby breeding involves more
than a one time litter. in the lifetime of that pursuit.

A "fancier breeder" has to be able to prove they show in certain
sanctioned dog or cat shows on a regular basis. What's "regular"? The
definition is ambiguous and arbitrary.

A "breed improver" breeder has to be able to prove they don't derive
"income" from breeding. Why does improvement of your product require
you to be a non-profit? Does Ford or GM require to have no income for
them to prove that they are engaged in product quality improvement?

This bill would have serious unintended consequences on countless
breeders who conform to ethical breeding practices without in anyway
addressing the problem. The only agenda that this bill addresses is
that of the anti-pet lobby.

Rather than impose a strategy such as mandatory spay/neuter that has
failed everywhere it has been attempted, the Commonwealth of Virgina
should leverage the success that Charlotteville, VA has had in its
animal shelters. This is the No Kill Equation as advanced by the No
Kill Advocacy Center. Charlottesville, VA is saving 92% of the dogs
and cats admitted to its open admissions shelter, making it a leader
in a nation that routinely kills 50% of dogs and cats admitted. This
success can only be accomplished when animal lovers within a community
work cooperatively to save lives.

I do not support that my elected representatives embark in legislative
actions that criminalizes me by default or require that I bear the
burden of proof of my ethicality so that those elements of my society
who pursue unethical behavior may be restrained.

This bill cannot be fixed by amendments since the fundamental premises
upon which it is based are flawed.

I fully expect that you will carefully reconsider the patently
one-sided arguments that resulted in the promotion of this bill and
see fit to revoke this bill at the first opportunity OR vote against
its passage forwith.
Sincerely
Ravi R. Iyer, MD, PhD

Read More...

Friday, January 25, 2008

Get a dog

Click on the arrows at the bottom to change the pages ...

Read More...

Dear Diary

Read More...

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

TN introduces ban on pit bull - includes AmStaff , Staffordshire Bull and others!

Fellow Dog Owners:

Please be a responsible dog owner and educate your TN State Senator
now! Please call your Tennessee state senator and flood the TN State
Senate with your letters of concern over the lack of knowledge and
respect as well as the attempt to destroy the civil rights of law
abiding citizens in the great state of Tennessee.
Thomas Kilby is the state senator sponsoring this bill that would make
it illegal to own or keep a Pit Bull, Staffordshire Terrier, American
Bulldog or any breed with at least 50% Pit Bull Terrier blood in the
state of Tennessee. If these breeds are banned in TN, a precedent
would be set for other breeds to follow. Please address the need for
responsible ownership, obedience training for all breeds and the need
to enforce the current state leash laws. Irresponsible owners should
be punished not the law abiding citizens that responsibly care for
their dogs.
Please pass this on to your dog loving friends!

Best regards,
Lyle Roetemeyer
White Bluff, TN 37187





Subject: TN introduces ban on pit bull - includes AmStaff ,
Staffordshire Bull and others!
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:38:31 +0000
PLEASE HELP!
Forwarded Message:

TN introduces ban on pit bull - includes AmStaff , Staffordshire Bull,
American Bulldog and others!

HEADS UP in Tennessee!!

Senate Bill 2738 filed for introduction 1/14/08
"Creates a class A misdemeanor of knowingly owning a pit bull in this state"

The expanded version of the bill defines pit bull:
(2) "Pit bull dog" means any pit bull terrier; and

(3) "Pit bull terrier" means any American pit bull terrier, S taffordshire bull

terrier, American bulldog or American Staffordshire terrier breed of dog or any

mixed breed of dog which contains as fifty percent (50%) of its breeding the

breed of American pit bull terrier, Staffordshire bull terrier,
American bulldog or

American Staffordshire terrier, so as to be identifiable as partially
of the breed

American pit bull terrier, Staffordshire bull terrier, American
bulldog or American

Staffordshire terrier.

(b) It is an offense for any person to knowingly own a pit bull dog in
this state.

(c) A violation of this section is a Class A misdemeanor.

(d) In addition to the penalty imposed in subsection (c), the court making the

sentencing determination for a person convicted under this section
shall order the

person convicted to surrender custody and forfeit the pit bull dog or
pit bull dogs if the...

To see the bill

http://www.legislature.state.tn.us/

Please pass this on to other bull dog people.
Thanks,
Jane Price
Chattanooga Kennel Club
Legislative Liaison



Read More...

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Family to Adopt Slain Marine's Dog

December 12, 2007 - 11:06pm

SAVANNAH, Ga. (AP) - Marine Cpl. Dustin Jerome Lee and his German
shepherd, Lex, scoured Iraq for roadside bombs together, slept next to
each other and even posed in Santa hats for a holiday photo.

Please click on the link for full article.

http://www.wtopnews.com/?nid=104&sid=1309368

Read More...

Monday, December 3, 2007

TENNIS BALLS ARE NOT SAFE FOR BIG DOGS

TENNIS BALLS ARE NOT SAFE FOR BIG DOGS
By DeTroy Kistner, Diamond State German Shepherd Club

Please Read this if you have a Ball-crazy German Shepherd, Golden
Retriever or Labrador.

While I was talking on the phone Sailor my I 0- month- old German
Shepherd brought me his ball for a game of indoor catch. It was a hard
rubber ball about tennis ball size. It had little raised dots of
rubber. I was quite sure it was too large for there to be any danger
of him swallowng it. I would toss it to him and he'd catch it on the
fly. We must have done it thirty times when suddenly I looked at
Sailor and saw that he was in great distress. I knew instantly that he
must have gotten the ball stuck in his throat on the last toss. His
head was down and he was trying to get it out but was unable to do so.
I dropped the phone not even taking one second to explain to the
caller what was happening. I grabbed my dog and he wriggled free
struggling to get air and free himself of the object lodged in his
throat. I was wrestling him in his own fight for survival.

Three times I grabbed him and three times he got away from me. Finally
I got him and pried open his mouth. Trying to get the ball out V,/ith
my fingers only seemed to cause it to slide further down in his
throat. The poor animal was struggling to be free of me and to get air
into his lungs again. The ball was now in his throat beyond reach,
like an enormous Adam's apple. He had locked his teeth and was trying
to swallow it. And of course he could not. By this time I am as
desperate and frantic as he is. I live on the fifteenth floor of a
pre-war building in mid- Manhattan. There is no vet in the building
and none of my neighbors are at home. I know that by the time the
elevator operator puts down his newspaper and saunters into the
elevator and brings the old machine up 15 stories my beloved young dog
will be near death. And then to go down again and try to find a cab
that would take me and the dog to a vet or the Animal Medical
Center... well, no creature on earth could go for that length of time
without air and make it.

Never have I felt more alone and scared then I did at that moment. I
knew that if couldn't figure out how to save him and do it quickly he
was going to die. I grabbed onto him again, straddling him. I put my
hand below the hall on the outside of his neck and gently worked the
ball up his throat the way you would work a ball through a tube or out
of the toe of a sock. It came up part way, but then Sailor eeled away
again in his panic and struggle. I grabbed him again and threw him on
the couch, again half straddling him to try and hold him. His teeth
were clamped down, I seemed to need at least four hands and I only had
two. I remember telling God I needed his help RIGHT NOW! I knew that
time was running out and the thought of my beautiful young dog dying
in my arms while I am powerless to help him gave me a feeling of
despair I'd never known before. Again I tried to work the ball up his
throat from the outside by squeezing it gently from beneath. SloWy but
surely it rose up his throat. I pried his teeth open with my fingers
and finally, holding his head against me and keeping one hand under
the ball, I was able to reach into his mouth and grab the ball from
the back of his throat and pull it out.

We sat there for a long time. He kept swallowing and was very quiet.
Young as he was he seemed to know how close to death he had come.
There was a fair amount of blood on my fingers and I wasn't sure
whether it had come from his throat. I thought that perhaps his throat
was tom so I took him to the vet immediately. The vet checked him out
and found him to be okay, but gave him some antibiotics just in case.
He told me that I had saved my dog's life. Most people, he said, try
to get help and the dog dies on the way. They just can't get to help
fast enough to save their dog. Usually, he said, when I see them they
are already dead. I see a lot of golden retrievers with tennis balls
that have died on the way.

Most of the blood had, I found out later, came from my own fingers
that had taken a bit of a beating prying open those clamped sharp baby
molars. My fingers were sore for days, but who cared I had my dog and
he was alive! I started to warn other owners of big ball-happy dogs in
Central Park. Some would respond with, "But he's never swallowed it
before." Yes, well the first time could be the LAST time. It only
takes one time for your dog to die. He may have caught it for years
and then one day he catches it on the fly and it gets beyond his
tongue and you can lose your dog.

Three weeks later a friend's German shepherd got a tennis ball caught
in his throat. The dog is seven years old and has been retrieving
tennis balls for years. It happened in Central Park and the NYPD
happened to be close by and threw the dog in the patrol car and raced
(sometimes literally over the sidewalk) to get it to the Animal
Medical Center.

The dog was blue and almost gone when they pulled up at the Animal
Medical Center. "What did they do?" I asked, expecting to hear about
quick major surgery. "Oh, they just worked it up his throat from the
outside and it popped right out!" said his owner. So why doesn't
anyone tell owners about this? Everyone thinks that a tennis bail is
safe. TENNIS BALLS ARE NOT SAFE FOR BIG DOGS.

I have heard that the Heimlich maneuver can be used to expel something
lodged in a dog's throat. I don't know whether it was a method that
might have worked. It is probably good to know as well. But I do know
that a major animal hospital used the same method of working it up
from the outside that I described. I think big dog owners should know
this. Obviously one doesn't take animal medicine into one's own hands
when there is a vet at one's elbow. But when your dog is for sure
going to die if YOU don't DO something then it is good to know
something you can do.- Last week I heard that another Central Park dog
died the same way. His owner tried to get the dog from the park into a
cab and to a vet and he didn't make it.

That's why I wanted to share this, because many people are so panicked
that they don't think to even try to work the ball up from the
outside. I thought perhaps this might save a dog's life. Now all
Sailor's balls are rope balls. They are tennis ball sized but there is
a rope attached. One mail order company even sells ones that float.
And the rope enables me to throw them further and Sailor gets a longer
run.

Read More...

Thursday, November 22, 2007

Reproductive problems:

DOG NEWS – "Veterinary Topics" by Connie Vanacor
Nov. 2, 2007

It is on the AKC Canine Health Foundation National Parent Club Health
Conference.
Page 90

"Some of the other speakers were Dr. Peggy Root Kustritz, who spoke on
canine reproduction:"

"Dr. Kustritz talked about diseases related to reproduction. Although
spaying and neutering have advantages, there are also dangers.

Advantages include the elimination of testicular cancer and of benign prostatic
hyperplasia.

On the negative side, males have a strong correlation to obesity after
castration, though there is no definite cause and effect. Castrated dogs have
twice the risk of developing prostatic adenocarcinoma as they age. They also
run a higher risk of developing osteosarcoma as the age. There is a
predisposition in large and giant breeds of this occurring. Neutered
Rottweilers
have a definite genetic predisposition to osteosarcoma. Acute Cranial Ligament
injury is seen in greater numbers with castrated dogs."

In bitches, spaying reduces or eliminates the risk of mammary cancer and
pyometra. However, it also increases the risk of osteosarcoma and
transitional cell carcinoma. It also causes incontinence in up to 20 percent of
females. Spaying before three months of age increases the risk of
incontinence.....There is a strong hormonal relationship between
spaying/neutering and the
diseases specific to each."

Read More...

Thursday, November 15, 2007

Progressive car insurance adds pet coverage

For no additional charge $500 benefit will be paid if animal is hurt or dies

updated 12:15 p.m. ET, Mon., Nov. 12, 2007

CLEVELAND - Progressive Corp. is providing collision coverage for
customers' dogs or cats at no additional premium cost. It will pay up
to $500 if a customer's dog or cat is hurt or dies in a car accident.

"It's an unusual and interesting benefit," said Jean Salvatore, a
senior vice president for the New York-based Insurance Information
Institute. She was not aware of any other company offering a collision
benefit for pets.

"Auto insurance is a very competitive market, and companies are always
looking for ways to differentiate themselves. If this becomes popular,
I'm sure others may look into it as well," Salvatore said.

There are over 150 million pets in the U.S., and Americans spend over
$40 billion on their pets annually, according to a recent Insurance
Information Institute study.

The Progressive benefit has been in place since Sept. 6, and it's
still too soon to determine if the company's undetermined cost of
offering it will be offset by better sales, Progressive spokeswoman
Leah Knapp said.

Auto insurance generally provides property, liability and medical coverage.

Typically, an insured person's collision coverage pays for the damage
to the insured's vehicle in a collision or other kind of accident,
such as when a driver loses control and a car overturns. But usually
there's no payment for pets who may be in the car.

Liability coverage would kick in for any pets hurt in a car other than
the insured's.

The new Progressive benefit is not pet insurance, which some people
obtain to help them pay veterinarian costs.

A Progressive strategist said the company saw a pets benefit as an
auto insurance market opportunity.

"We found no coverage that was even similar to it," said Geoff Souser,
Progressive product manager for auto insurance. "We have pets, too,
and we know how important they are to our families. We are always
looking for new and different ways of delivering value to our
customers, and this seemed like a logical extension."

Progressive is the third-biggest auto insurer, ranking behind State
Farm and Allstate and slightly ahead of National Indemnity (Berkshire
Hathaway), which includes GEICO.

State Farm and Allstate confirmed a pets benefit is not in the
collision part of their policies. A message was left with a GEICO
spokeswoman.

Progressive's pet benefit is available in 46 states and the District
of Columbia; it's not yet available in North Carolina, New Hampshire,
New York and Virginia, but the company hopes to offer it in those
states soon.

Read More...

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

GBM Election Results

The the following changes resulted from the GBM elections.

Board of Inquiry/Alternate

Jim Ackerman (replaces Richard Quinn)
Email: racke45000@aol.com

Director at Large (new position to bring total number to five)

Frank Phillips (new)
Email: schh3fh2@comcast.net

Judges Committee/Member at Large

Mike Gardner (new)
Email: mgd675@gmail.com

Willie Ortner (delete)

Nominating Committee

Ravi Iyer (new)
Email: juneau@vmacnova.com

Charles Norton (new)
Email: cfn@pacbell.net

Nikki Banfield (delete)

Pam Hanrahan (delete)

Read More...

Friday, October 26, 2007

Anger Management

Read More...

Thursday, October 25, 2007

2007 Sieger Show Impressions - by Fred Lanting

2007 Sieger Show Impressions - by Fred Lanting


2007 Sieger Pakros



2007 Siegerin Gina Aquamarin



As always, my report on the international German Shepherd Dog “Sieger Show”, the main event for the breed that is held annually in Germany, consists of two parts, and you might only see part of the whole “picture”, depending on what magazine or website you are reading this on. Editors sometimes must edit, you know! In my comments, I will give in parentheses the latest Zuchtwert (ZW) hip ratings as of the time of writing, as readers expect that from the author of the book on hip dysplasia. Remember, the lower numbers are best, and anything over the low 80s makes me a little nervous.

One part of this report is my abbreviated travelogue, in which I invite you to join my non-profit tour to the show, the area of Europe, and to breeders and training clubs. My expertise as an SV judge is of help to especially the newer people in the sport, but all my group can benefit by sharing costs instead of trying to “go it lone”; I also find delightful and economical hotels that most people don’t discover. For some fifteen years I have been attending this big show, and for most of those years, I have helped novices learn more about the sport and Europe while saving them money in the process. There is something for everyone, especially those who admire “the total dog”. In regions such as 2007’s Braunschweig venue, there are few show-line breeders, but we drove some distances east and west of there to visit some of them. There are more Schutzdienst (working competition) fanciers along this old Iron Curtain area than Hochtzuchtlinie (show) people.
My 2007 group promised to be the most international ever. Unfortunately, two from Trinidad, two from the USA, and one from Canada had to cancel. But we still had two from Uruguay, two from Australia, one from Argentina, and one from Egypt. I am from Alabama, which is nominally a part of the U.S., despite rumors to the contrary. At times it was rather comical in a confused way as I switched from German to Spanish to English in my job of explaining the details of the show or descriptions of dogs. And in the van, the polyglot of languages as everyone was talking, made me think that I was driving up the ramped ziggurat of the Tower of Babel instead of along the super German Autobahns. My group this year were all show-oriented, so we cancelled the training club visit I had lined up, and concentrated on breeder kennels a greater distance away.
To minimize jet lag so that it would not interfere with the first long day (Friday) of the show, we arrived on Wednesday the 29th of August and leisurely traveled from the Hannover airport to our delightful hotel in a small village less than a half-hour from the show site. I always arrange lodging in such intimate, small family hotels and “guest houses”, and this one was operated by a fleischer (butcher) who made, in the ground-floor shop, all the sausages, chops, and coldcuts that we had in abundance. The family even took us to an American-cowboy-theme barbeque at a friend’s house one night, and accompanied us on kennel visits the next day.
The show lasts three days, and the other four or five days of my annual tour include some sightseeing as well as meetings with breeders. This year we only had one day of shopping and sights, going on Monday through the town of Goslar, one of the few that was unaffected directly by the bombing of World-War-2. The reason it was spared is that it was a “hospital town” with red crosses painted on the roofs. The Allied pilots spared several such towns. Consequently, buildings and parts of medieval walls dating from as early as 1000A.D. were still standing. In America, we think that a driving distance of 250 miles is not very great but 250 years is impossibly old for a building; in Europe, a 250-year-old building might still be called “the new church” or some such descriptive term, but a 250-mile drive is extremely long.
On the first full day (Thursday) we were in-country, I took the group to visit with breeders Theo and Angelika Landers in Bad Oyenhausen; they go to American shows quite often, but skipped entering the Sieger Show this year because of the SV/FCI crackdown on size. Most of what they had to show was a centimeter or so over the recently enforced “maximum”. I may have some comments in the future about how I feel this restriction is not genetically or logically sound, but not here. Anyway, the Landers did not have much for sale this time, though there were a couple of good ones available. Several years ago, another visit to their kennel produced sales of some of their dogs to tour group members. Almost half the time, some of the breeders we visit mange to sell dogs to some in my group. This year, five or six were in the market and may have decided on purchasing by this time.
On Tuesday after the show weekend, we looked at dogs, pictures, and pedigrees in Berlin and, on the way, saw stark remnants of Soviet-occupation-era buildings and Iron Curtain guard posts. On Wednesday we drove the other direction, past Hannover again, to Bielefeld where we were treated with great hospitality by the Niedergassel family to a soup-and-sausage lunch and the pleasure of posing for photos with great dogs, notably Sirio della Real Favorita (a Sieger Zamp son out of Roma Holkämper-See), Idol (94) and Odin Holtkämper-Hof (80), the latter two being sons of the great Yak Frankengold (94) who was sired by Hoss Lärchenhain (74). Idol was not shown this year, but many of his offspring did well. Odin was VA-8 this year and is truly a superstar worthy of accolades. What a magnificent head and self-assurance! As well as other qualities, of course.
Sirio (78), rumored to be a centimeter too tall for the judge, was not as ruggedly masculine, but still a beautiful animal with a nice pedigree, especially on his dam’s side. Judges are under much greater pressure these days to penalize withers height than they have been since the days of Vello Sieben-Faulen (one of the greatest producing sires of all time). I have a nice female pup sired by Nick Moorbeck (69) and out of Sirio’s sister Stella (78); every day I look at her and marvel at the same rich red pigment that Zamp and (especially) Nero give.
That evening, the Aussies and the man from Argentina had to leave, and the Egypt-based Indian lady already had been put on a train to the airport because of pressing business at home, so by late that night there were only three of us left. The Australians had remembered me from when I judged and lectured in their country and New Zealand in 1991. The Uruguayans knew me from a couple of Sieger Show judging assignments in Montevideo (I had given their dog BOB on one of those occasions). The other two were new friends whom I hope to see again. My reports on the Sieger Shows each year bring me possible additional tour members. If you would like to be guided by an SV breed judge who has trained many dogs to Schutzhund titles and is familiar with most of Germany and some adjoining countries, and if you’d like to experience the cultural and natural attractions as well as the show, let me know as soon as you can. I can also put together Sieger Show tours in Italy, Argentina, and other countries if I have enough people to spread out my costs among. In 2008, the German show will be in Aachen, along the Holland and Belgium borders, and I already have some breeders lined up to visit. People save money by going with me rather than doing a trip alone, and I do not charge a fee, only a prorated share of expenses. E-mail me about it, and look for my articles via Google or similar search engines, or on the siriusdog.com website.
In my earlier e-mails to my 2007 group and a few others, I correctly predicted all eight of this year’s VA (excellent-select) males. I had suggested that perhaps one more might make that elite status but he ended up a highly respectable V-17. Yet more proof of my mortality and fallibility, right? Also remember that my observations are based on having had GSDs since 1947, and while they are matters of fact to me, I am quite willing for my readers to consider them merely opinions if they can come close to my background in the subject. If you disagree strongly and often, one of us probably lives on a different planet.
Let’s consider the VA males first. Interestingly, the first four VA dogs this year are all non-German owned! Make of that what you will. With Zamp out of the running, Pakros (ZW: 81) was the obvious successor to the throne. This year he was in the best condition ever, and his slightly steep croup even seemed to have improved (though we could still see that minor problem in his progeny). This is “an Italian dog” in the sense that his kennel name (d’Ulmental) and owner are Italian, though he is a Bax Luisenstrasse son out of Karma Ochsentor. The numbers of Italian competitors and spectators this year were far greater than any year I can remember, and it almost made me feel I was in Naples or another city there, except for the unusually very cold weather. Pakros has good color, proportions, powerful gait, and smooth body contours. He performed, every centimeter, as the epitome of a Sieger.
In second place was Quenn Löher Weg (80), an Uran Moorbeck son with (I am told) a very good progeny class this year. The reason I say it that way is because I was in the middle of the progeny class handling one of his sons, and was paying to much attention to my job during those moments. The owners of Quenn, more non-Germans, are Uday and Nina Jani of the UK. Quenn is a handsome male of good size and quite uniform progeny. I would have liked to see better determination in the bitework of some of this family, but then I am more demanding in this area than most of my fellow judges and show fanciers.
Third was Dux de Cuatro Flores (83), a Spanish-owned son of Hill Farbenspiel and Lina Arminius. His progeny did very well in Friday’s courage tests, for the most part, which I expect from the Hill line. It was an exception when his promising Italian son Robuk failed to retain the grip on Friday and was rated nicht genugend (not enough, or not O.K.). Fourth VA, Vegas du Haut Mansard (93), is the French son of Pakros that won his youth class a couple years earlier over a better-moving Ando son (Sony) who should have had the owners. Here is a case of the Biblical observation holding true, about the sins of the fathers being visited upon the sons, as a whopping percentage of the offspring had the same or worse faulty front action that was hard for me to swallow. Still, Vegas is a nicely colored dog who makes a lovely picture from the side. So we see that the top four VA dogs are owned by people with residence addresses in countries other than Germany. This year, there is a significant increase in this situation.
Fifth VA was Orbit Huhnegrab (85), a Sgr. Yasko son out of a VA2 Timo Berrekasten (88) daughter. He is a well-pigmented, substantial male with a strong though not perfect overline, is very good coming and going, and had a good normal progeny class. Last year none of his progeny were over two years’ age, which probably would have held him back if that were also the case this year. In my opinion, the dam line improves on Yasko’s minor shortcomings.
In sixth place was the Yello St.Michaelsberg son, Nando Gollerweiher, a dark and well-pigmented dog of pleasing outline and proportions. I did not get a chance to see him do his bitework this year, as I had some business to take care of at the SV tent when he was being presented on Friday. Only 3.5 years old this year, he will probably be at his peak next year in Aachen. The VA-7 dog was Ingodds Agassi (88) who, as you can deduce from his name, was born in Norway and is owned by Berliners Frank Goldlust and Susannah Reiman. We visited Frank’s house the following week, but Agassi was living with someone else, and Herr Goldlust did not show us any other dogs. It was a long ride to just look at photos. Agassi did good bitework on Friday and looked very good in gaiting, appearing somewhat drier than his sire Ghandi Arlett. I suspect he takes more after his dam, whom I’ve never seen. He is four years old, and almost surely will compete again next year unless sold to China or another country.
In last VA place was the outstandingly handsome, masculine, completely impressive male Odin Holtkaemper-Hof (80). This male closely resembles his famous sire Yak Frankengold who is in China until he retires from stud service there. Yak’s sire Hoss, you may remember, dropped out of favor some years back when DNA testing showed that his advertised parentage was not correct, and uncovered less-famous, somewhat unproven ancestry. This did not sit well with those who believed that nothing good could come out of dogs not carrying the favorite bloodlines, a similar shortsightedness that caused so much prejudice against the great Timo despite his linebreeding on the famous Q-litter Arminius. The fact that Hoss brought so much vitality and excellence of character and anatomy was ignored, but his quality would not go away. This is an important sire line that contributes not only genetic diversity but great individual characteristics as well. Odin (and to a good extent his half-siblings) can offer us a great deal. I hope that he continues to dispel the bias against Hoss’ descent line, and represents Yak well, as almost all in this family have done so far. We were almost knocked out of our socks by the presence and power of this magnificent animal. As he is only four years old, he should contribute much in the next two years.
V-1 was Yimmy v Contra (114), who is a nice-looking dog but whose high placing was undoubtedly influenced by the fact that his sire is Sgr. Larus Batu and his owner is the former chief Sieger Show judge Erich Orschler. Certainly this dark male is very handsome and powerful, but this year’s judge, Reinhardt Meyer, when broadcasting his comments, made a point of that high ZW number, indicating that it is a warning flag for breeders who want to avoid or minimize HD. He let it be known that he would not consider the dog for VA, no matter how good he looked on the surface. This was a bit different from when Rikkor Bad-Boll (102) was named Sieger several years ago with similarly high ZW, and to my mind this year’s move was a good one. Reinhardt was my final supervisor when I became an SV breed judge, and I also judged at the Indian Sieger Show weekend some years later when he did the work one day and I did the next. He typically makes wise decisions.
As I said, I was away from the courage tests for a short while on the first day of the show, so I missed a few dogs who may have performed very well, but I’d like to comment on some that I watched carefully. It comes as no surprise that a few of the working-lines dogs did well, but the biggest applause Friday was given to the absolutely perfect work of a male owned by Michaele Knoche: Javir v Talka Marda (72), sire, Dago Schwarzen Pegasus; dam, Quaste Arkenrutt. To watch this dog’s fabulous and faultless bark-and-hold, fast attacks, immediate outs, and unwavering focus, was indeed thrilling to everyone. It was a shame that he was not in the breed ring on Sunday.
The dog who got the second-greatest applause in the protection/courage evaluation Friday also got the greatest applause in the breed ring Sunday. That was the Timo Berrekasten son V-28 Arex Herbramer-Wald (91), owned by Gerd Dexel. He is an excellent, happy worker in both arenas, and in the breed ring he showed the same characteristics as his sire: great front reach, ground-covering powerful gait off-leash while leaving others in the dust, a tremendously handsome masculine head, nice overall anatomy, and a marvelous personality. He was moved forward considerably in the large group a couple of times (each time to great applause), but nowhere near where the crowd felt he deserved. One of my fellow judges guessed that it was because this 5-year-old didn’t have much in the way of winning progeny, but agreed that this was because of the persistent anti-sable (grey) prejudice. For character and shoulder improvement, this dog should be used on low-ZW (or low-BVA-score) bitches before he becomes no longer available. Two of my tour group who were looking for good bitches to buy expressed desire to have them mated to Arex. They are advised to get a bitch with a very low ZW number.
A few short comments on other dogs may be of interest. The V3 Negus Holtkamper-See (78) should be stronger in character, which observation might be expected if one looks at the sire line (Sgr Zamp [91] - Quantum Arminius [99] – Dux della Valcuvia [102]), as there is a slight weakness in character there (see my previous “Impressions” articles). Brother Naxos (76) was V27. This year’s V4 Quantum Fiemereck (73) did very good work; he is a Rocky Haus Tepferd (75) son (and therefore half-brother to a male I have who also has excellent hips). V5 Uran Wilhelmswarte (79) showed the good bitework of so many other sons of Dux Cuatro Flores. The Quando Sofienwald (99) son, V6 Bazi Urbecke (84) did excellent protection work, as did the very good-looking V7 Yerom Haus Salihin (86) owned by Budiman Salihin. The latter is a son of Mark Schwalmbergtal (82) who was killed by envious enemies in Indonesia last year, a great loss to all of us in this sport. For V8, Reinhardt chose the Maffay Arminius (76) son, Djenges Kahn v Sante’s Home (73), bred in Holland and owned by Norbert Schleuter who produced he great Ando Altenbergerland. Djenges demonstrated the combination of excellent work and good looks, though he has a slightly short, slightly steep croup, and he needs more training in off-leash fast-gaiting.
The Nero Nöbachtal (73) son, Solo Team Fiemereck (92), who failed the courage test last year, did OK work this year and earned a V-11 place in the breed ring. There is a little weakness in many Nero offspring regarding the desirable trait of self-confidence, and this needs to be watched by breeders who want Nero’s other, better qualities. A dog who deserves a better placing, and hopefully will get it next year is the 4-year-old Hill Farbenspiel (96) son, Andrjuscha van Noort (87), owned by American Walter Monroe. This V13 male, bred by Edzard Müller, is beautiful in anatomy and brave in character, with good bites and good outs (releases). The Bax/Hill “blood” is proving to be quite valuable in both construction and character.
Some more generalized observations on adult males: Vegas tends to reproduce his faulty front. Dux Cuatro Flores gives good workers with good anatomy, with few exceptions such as Robuk Monti della Laga, who looked handsome but did not maintain the bite. Yak grandsons and sons, such as V9 Ilbo Holtkämper-See (80), did very well in both arenas. Several of Quenn Löher Weg’s offspring were disappointing in the courage tests. Most E-litter van Noort sons did good protection work, as did Flipp Arlett sons as a rule. One of the latter was not yet Schutzhund titled when I judged with Erich Bösl in Estonia earlier in the year, or he would have won that show — this is the Swedish dog V35 Mischaland’s Joaqin (93) who did very good protection work and had very pleasing gait; Anders and Susanne Eriksson are justifiably proud of this nice young stud dog. There were a large number of Zeppo Klebinger-Schloss (86) sons, but no progeny class for him. I was told that Zeppo is too tall for today’s “wicket-crazy” breed wardens, and produces many weak ears. Karat’s Ulk did an excellent courage test, but got some excuse, upon request, so he was not seen in the breed ring. Some dogs do not show up for breed competition following the courage demonstration (usually after some indication by the judge during the individual and preliminary judgments). Perhaps the owner doesn’t want the embarrassment of being behind dogs he considers inferior. In any case, such absentee dogs are prohibited from being exhibited for several months. But this is even less than a slap on the wrist — a meaningless “punishment” — because there are no shows after the Sieger Show, anyway, until the following spring.
On the distaff side of the fields, I felt that the VA4 Yasmin Nieuwlandshof (88) was definitely the best bitch. She was bred in Holland, owned by a German, and out of an Italian dam named Yelena Fossombrone (90). I could not disagree with Bernhard Norda’s choices for VA2 and VA3, although the former began to tire at one point and stab the ground a little in front; she is an Italian daughter of Zamp named Pania d Alto Pino (85). The latter, Häsel v Streek (91) is a Whisky Bierstadter-Hof daughter out of a Dutch dam. VA-1 and Siegerin is Gina Aquamarin (82) owned by Gerde Dexel; I would have penalized her a little for lifting too much in front at all speeds, although she presents a beautiful picture from the side while in stance. I trust this Fedor Gelingenstrasse - Hanka Türkenkopf daughter will be bred successfully and wisely. The Dexel family has bred and owned many superb dogs over the years — the first that I remember was the 1963 Sieger Ajax Haus Dexel who gave great hips, character, and shoulder angles; I had a nice litter once that was linebred on Ajax, with great temperament and beauty, and was surprised to find a blue-and-tan in the nest, though I suspect it came from the “American” sides of the family. Much water has passed under the bridge since then, and it’s good to see that Richard’s son Gerd is continuing the fine tradition today.
I could not watch as many females in the courage tests as I have in some years, but a few stood out for me. Helmut Buss’ Boogie again did excellent work but unfortunately was pulled before breed-ring competition. I saw an Esko Danischen Hof daughter named Sara Schlicher-Hof (74) do very good work and considered her anatomy superior to her V66 placing. The VA8 Delma Trompetersprung (92) did very admirable work and V3 Lyra Radhaus (81) showed she could work as beautifully as she could trot. This Pakros daughter inherited his tendency to fall off a bit in the croup, but all else was remarkable. One that I had expected to make VA was V4 Chanel degli Achei (89), an Italian-bred Zamp daughter with wonderful stride and reach and very good protection work. The V5 Hill Farbenspiel daughter Andra Wattenscheid (90) could have placed a little higher in the breed ring, based on her movement, in my estimation. A Dux C-F daughter named Elfi Wildsteiger Landhaus (84) from the kennel of Maria and Martin Göbl’s son Marcus did very good outs and obedience, as did most of her sire’s other offspring. Another group I led in recent years had seen this litter when we visited WildsteigerLand in Bavaria. One of the best performances I saw was that of a Karat’s Ulk daughter, Dassy v Contra (98) — the bites, hold-and-bark, and obedience were excellent. Too bad she also was pulled before we had a chance to see her trotting in the breed ring. In general, bitches by Hill, Ulk, Orbit Huhnegrab, and Dux Cuatro Flores worked very well on Friday, and several of these made good placings the next couple of days.
In the dogs under 24 months, there were several stand-outs. One with a very promising future is Uday and Nina Jani’s home-bred Godalis Tino (73) whose anatomy and hip rating will be a valuable addition to the gene pool in the UK and elsewhere. Watch for this super youngster who won the 18-24-mo. class under judge Henning Setzer. His dam is an Orbit Tronje (75) daughter and his sire is VA2 Quenn (80). Another Quenn son, Tyson Köttersbusch (79) was SG3 in the same class. The Dux C-F son Sony Heinrichplatz (72) was SG2, is owned by Budiman Salihin, and was bred by Pia Gellesun of Berlin, whose kennel we visited this year. SG4 was the handsome Taureg Bad-Boll (72), who could have been in 3rd place for my money; his hock action was better, for one thing. Another from this class that impressed me was Fargo Lärchenhain (80), by Zamp out of the excellent Boogie Ochsentor (79). This really super-looking dog only got SG33 for some unfathomed reasons and it might be worth making a bid on him. SG7 was Arak Ferme Malgre L'eau (84) who, a few months earlier, had placed 1st in front of Tino at a regional show in Hemer under the same judge. Some consider this an upset or a surprise, but dogs have their days when they do better or worse than on other days.
The 12-18-mo. males (Jugendklasse) were led by a Quantum Arminius son, Panjo Kirschental (92). It was nice talking briefly with Mrs. Fuller who was getting around better with the aid of crutches and obviously enjoying her win; husband Karl is doing well, too, she said. Second place in the same class was awarded to Furbo degli Achei (ZW:? but littermates are in the high 80s) from Italy, a Quenn son who appeared a bit too heavy-bodied for this age, and his croup fell off a bit too much for my tastes. Much better in my eyes was the SG3 Gio Frankengold, an Agassi son with very nice anatomy. SG4 was Xaro ben Harten (93), a Peruvian son of Zamp and VA Anta. Many in this age group have not yet had their hip radiographs rated.
An Esko Danischen-Hof daughter named Ronja Haus Burow (94), managed by Rudiger Mai, took the 18-24-mo. female Junghund class, while another Esko daughter was SG6. In 12-18-mo. bitches, SG-1 was the outstanding Paula Gut Lethe, a daughter of Negus, and who has a very promising future if shown again before settling down to make babies. The Vegas daughter SG2 Birdy Domaine du Parc steps too high and wide in front, and another Vegas daughter SG3 Ussi Pallas Athene also was typically wide in front. Not my cup of tea. Unfortunately, SG4 was yet another Vegas daughter, Jana Plassenburg. A quite nice Idol daughter, Zenzi Zellergrund was in 5th place, breaking the Vegas chain. A very nice Quenn daughter was SG9. I felt that Pakros and Odin produced much better quality in this class than Vegas did.
I invite you to join me next year and have fun watching great dogs, eating delicious food, seeing sights you don’t have in your back yard, and enjoying the company of other dog lovers. Fred Lanting, Mr.GSD@netscape.com

editor’s note: Fred is a superannuated SV Zuchtrichter (breed judge) and author of several books, among them are The Total GSD, and the monumental work on orthopedic disorders. You can get autographed books directly from the author and schedule judging or lectures by e-mailing him.



Read More...

Monday, October 1, 2007

Dogs and People

Press Enter and then Click on arrows at the bottom of the slides to see the next slide(s)...

Read More...

Sunday, September 2, 2007

SV-BUNDESSIEGERZUCHTSCHAU

Results of Show

31.08.2007-02.09.2007

Working Class Males - Gebrauchshundklasse Rüden


VA 1 Pakros d' Ulmental
VA 2 Quenn vom Löher Weg
VA 3 Dux de Cuatro Flores
VA 4 Vegas du Haut Mansard
VA 5 Orbit vom Hühnegrab
VA 6 Nando vom Gollerweiher
VA 7 Ingodds Agassi
VA 8 Odin vom Holtkämper Hof

V 1 Yimmy v. Contra
V 2 Aron della Terra dei Forti
V 3 Negus vom Holtkämper See
V 4 Quantum vom Fiemereck
V 5 Uran von der Wilhelmswarte
V 6 Bazi von der Urbecke
V 7 Yerom vom Haus Salihin
V 8 Djenges Kahn v. Sante's Home
V 9 Ilbo vom Holtkämper See
V 10 Kalli von der Werther-Mühle


Complete results - click here


Working Class Females - Gebrauchshundklasse Hündinnen

VA 1 Gina vom Aquamarin
VA 2 Pania dell' Alto Pino
VA 3 Häsel vom Streek
VA 4 Yasmin v. Nieuwlandshof
VA 5 Lana von der Zenteiche
VA 6 Benny d' Ulmental
VA 7 Anika van de Herdersfarm
VA 8 Delma vom Trompetersprung
VA 9 Chiara vom Steffen Haus


V 1 Alisha vom Eichenplatz
V 2 Viva von der Hopfenhalle
V 3 Lyra v. Radhaus
V 4 Chanel degli Achei
V 5 Andra aus Wattenscheid
V 6 Yola de al Malaki
V 7 Biene vom Valtenberg
V 8 Daphne vom Elzmündungsraum
V 9 Lea d' Ulmental
V 10 Vanta Cite D'Emeraude



Complete results - click here



For all results - please click here

Read More...